Search

Two groups of mathematics faculty, one from a four-year college and one from a two-year college, redesigned their respective introductory college mathematics courses following presentation of observational data regarding how faculty had been teaching the courses. This presentation emphasised how infrequently faculty teaching introductory college mathematics employed recommended pedagogical practices. This work was part of a multi-year federal grant project designed to increase the numbers of underrepresented students majoring in STEM disciplines. While the two teams developed very different redesigned course activities, in both instances the primary motivation for initiating the work was the information provided to faculty in a professional development workshop regarding how they had previously been observed teaching the mathematics content and how infrequently they utilised the pedagogical practices recommended by STEM education experts. The paper also highlights faculty resistance to curricular reform and enumerates some ways of addressing this resistance. The paper also discusses why faculty from two-year and four-year institutions resisted working together on course redesign and provides recommendations for future efforts addressing course redesign. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A steward of the discipline was originally defined as an individual to whom "we can entrust the vigor, quality, and integrity of the field", and more specifically, as "someone who will creatively generate new knowledge, critically conserve valuable and useful ideas, and responsibly transform those understandings through writing, teaching, and application" [8]. Originally articulated for doctoral education, in 2019 the construct of stewardship was expanded so that it can also be applied to non-academic practitioners in any field, and can be initiated earlier than doctoral education [18]. In this paper we apply this construct to the context of mathematics and argue that even for those early in their training in mathematics, stewardly practice of mathematics can be introduced and practiced. Postsecondary and tertiary education in mathematics -- for future mathematicians as well as those who will use math at work -- can include curriculum-spanning training, and documented achievement in stewardship. Even before a formal ethical practice standard for mathematics is developed and deployed to help inculcate math students with a "tacit responsibility for the quality and integrity of their own work", higher education can begin to shape student attitudes towards stewardly professional identities. Learning objectives to accomplish this are described, to assist math instructors in facilitating the recognition and acceptance of responsibility for the quality and integrity of their own work and that of colleagues in the practice of mathematics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this paper was to examine current mathematics interventions designed for students in kindergarten through eighth grade to determine how often they incorporated the five strands of mathematical proficiency identified by the National Research Council (2001). The five strands are conceptual understanding, procedural knowledge, strategic competence, adaptive reasoning, and productive disposition. A systematic review of the literature resulted in 13 meta‐analyses of that studied a total of 19 unique interventions. The five strands of mathematical proficiency were then compared to each intervention to determine with which strand(s) the intervention aligned. None of the 19 interventions contained all five strands, but interventions could be combined to enhance math proficiency. The strands of mathematics proficiency could provide a framework with which to meaningfully combine intervention components. HIGHLIGHTS: A review of 19 math interventions found that none of them addressed all five strands of proficiency, and it would require combinations of them to do so. The strands of math proficiency could provide a framework for intervention decisions in math. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]