Search

• An innovative framework to derive intensity-frequency-duration curves from satellite data for remote areas. • A variant of the Bartlett-Lewis model calibrated with sub-daily satellite precipitation data to disaggregate daily gauge data. • This new framework was tested for a wide range of climates in Australia. • IFD curves can be derived with reasonable accuracy for data scarce regions. Intensity-frequency-duration (IFD) curves (also known as intensity-duration-frequency (IDF) curves in some regions) are widely used to take into consideration the probability of occurrence of extreme precipitation for the design of water related infrastructure. Derivation of IFD curves is based on statistical analysis of observed extreme precipitation events and thus the reliability of the curves mostly depends on the record length of observations. At sub-hourly timescales however, ground-based precipitation observations are often absent or very limited in terms of spatial coverage and record length, particularly in remote areas around the world. Given the availability of satellite-derived precipitation products (SPPs) with finer spatiotemporal resolution and near-global coverage, there is great potential to use these products in the planning and design of infrastructure. This paper proposes a novel framework, SIFD (Satellite-derived IFD curves) to combine long-term daily gauge data and sub-hourly SPP to estimate IFD curves for time intervals from 0.5 to 24 h. A recent variant of the Random Parameter Bartlett-Lewis Rectangular Pulse model (RPBLRPX) was used to disaggregate daily gauge data to derive IFD curves. In the absence of sub-daily rain gauge data, the statistics required for the RPBLRPX model were obtained using the Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG; 30-min, 0.1° resolution) product derived from the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission. Performance of the SIFD framework was tested against gauge data from seven Australian sites across a wide range of climatologies. The disaggregation scheme coupled with the RPBLRPX model was capable of reproducing the wet-period mean intensity, wet-period standard deviation, and wet-period fraction with reasonable accuracy across the sub-daily timescales. The coefficient of determination ( r 2) values were 0.39 (mean intensity), 0.38 (standard deviation), and 0.87 (wet-period fraction) at 0.5 h timescale. Furthermore, despite some differences in methodology and record length, the IFD estimates computed using the SIFD framework were fairly close to those of the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM). The skill metrics for Sydney were the best with a bias ratio (BR) of 1.01, root mean square error (RMSE) of 13% of the mean of the BoM estimates, and a Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (NSE) of 0.97. The worst case was found at Hobart (BR = 1.43, RMSE = 66%, and NSE = 0.26). Overall, the results indicate that the proposed SIFD framework could provide a viable alternative to estimate unbiased IFD curves at the sub-hourly timescale in the absence of adequate sub-hourly ground-based observations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]