Search

Aim: This study examined children's health care service use, mothers' workforce participation, and mothers' community engagement based on children's risk of developmental delay.Method: We used data from the All Our Families study, a prospective pregnancy cohort. Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) scores at year 2 indicated risk of developmental delay. To investigate the impact of risk of developmental delay when children were not diagnosed, a sensitivity analysis excluded reports of neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) diagnosis at year 3. Outcomes were maternal reports of children's health and allied health visits (and estimated costs), and maternal workforce participation and community engagement from year 2 to 3.Results: Among 1314 mother-child dyads, 209 (16%) children were classified as being at risk of developmental delay by the ASQ, and 42 (3%) had a reported diagnosis of NDD. Risk of developmental delay was related to increased use of allied health care services (incidence risk ratio 5.04 [year 3]; 95% confidence interval 2.49-10.2) and health visits (incidence risk ratio 1.33 [year 3]; 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.54). The average expected allied health costs were greater for children at risk versus not at risk of developmental delay. However, when excluding children with reported diagnoses of an NDD from this analysis, increased service use and costs in the remaining at-risk population were not observed. Community engagement and workplace participation among families did not differ on the basis of risk of developmental delay.Interpretation: These results suggest increased health care service use by families of children at risk of developmental delay is driven by those receiving a diagnosis of an NDD in the subsequent year.What This Paper Adds: Early developmental delay risk was related to health care service use and costs. Diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorder drove increased health care service use and costs. Early developmental delay risk did not relate to parental workforce participation. Early developmental delay risk did not relate to community engagement participation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Children born very preterm require additional specialist care because of the health and developmental risks associated with preterm birth, but information on their health service use is sparse. We sought to describe the use of specialist services by children born very preterm in Europe.Method: We analysed data from the multi-regional, population-based Effective Perinatal Intensive Care in Europe (EPICE) cohort of births before 32 weeks' gestation in 11 European countries. Perinatal data were abstracted from medical records and parents completed a questionnaire at 2 years corrected age (4322 children; 2026 females, 2296 males; median gestational age 29wks, interquartile range [IQR] 27-31wks; median birthweight 1230g, IQR 970-1511g). We compared parent-reported use of specialist services by country, perinatal risk (based on gestational age, small for gestational age, and neonatal morbidities), maternal education, and birthplace.Results: Seventy-six per cent of the children had consulted at least one specialist, ranging across countries from 53.7% to 100%. Ophthalmologists (53.4%) and physiotherapists (48.0%) were most frequently consulted, but individual specialists varied greatly by country. Perinatal risk was associated with specialist use, but the gradient differed across countries. Children with more educated mothers had higher proportions of specialist use in three countries.Interpretation: Large variations in the use of specialist services across Europe were not explained by perinatal risk and raise questions about the strengths and limits of existing models of care.What This Paper Adds: Use of specialist services by children born very preterm varied across Europe. This variation was observed for types and number of specialists consulted. Perinatal risk was associated with specialist care, but did not explain country-level differences. In some countries, mothers' educational level affected use of specialist services. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To test the hypothesis that children and young people with neurological conditions who missed outpatient appointments have more emergency inpatient admissions and Accident and Emergency centre (A&E) visits than those who missed none.Method: Retrospective cohort of individuals aged up to 19 years with neurological conditions, identified from routine hospital data in England, UK from April 1st, 2003 to March 31st, 2015 using an International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, coding framework. Counts of emergency inpatient admissions and A&E visits per person per year were modelled (random intercept negative binomial regression) with outpatient attendance the independent variable of interest.Results: The cohort numbered 524 613 individuals. Those who missed outpatient appointments had 19 per cent (95% confidence interval [CI] 18-19) more emergency inpatient admissions and 16 per cent (95% CI 15-17) more A&E visits per year than those who missed none. 'Did not attends' had a larger increase in unplanned health care than patient or provider cancellations. If no appointments were missed, the models predict there would have been 107 000 fewer A&E visits from 2007/2008 to 2014/2015 and 104 000 fewer emergency inpatient admissions from 2003/2004 to 2014/2015.Interpretation: Missed outpatient appointments were associated with increased unplanned health care. Improving outpatient attendance may have the potential to reduce emergency inpatient admissions and A&E visits.What This Paper Adds: Missed outpatient appointments by children and young people with neurological conditions are associated with increased unplanned health care. Both emergency inpatient admissions and Accident and Emergency centre visits are increased. 'Did not attends' are more strongly associated with unplanned health care than cancellations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]