1. A Two-Stage Hybrid Default Discriminant Model Based on Deep Forest.
- Author
-
Li, Gang, Ma, Hong-Dong, Liu, Rong-Yue, Shen, Meng-Di, Zhang, Ke-Xin, and Anbarjafari, Gholamreza
- Subjects
CONVOLUTIONAL neural networks ,RANDOM forest algorithms ,DEEP learning ,BANKING industry ,FEATURE selection ,CREDIT ratings ,MACHINE learning - Abstract
Background: the credit scoring model is an effective tool for banks and other financial institutions to distinguish potential default borrowers. The credit scoring model represented by machine learning methods such as deep learning performs well in terms of the accuracy of default discrimination, but the model itself also has many shortcomings such as many hyperparameters and large dependence on big data. There is still a lot of room to improve its interpretability and robustness. Methods: the deep forest or multi-Grained Cascade Forest (gcForest) is a decision tree depth model based on the random forest algorithm. Using multidimensional scanning and cascading processing, gcForest can effectively identify and process high-dimensional feature information. At the same time, gcForest has fewer hyperparameters and has strong robustness. So, this paper constructs a two-stage hybrid default discrimination model based on multiple feature selection methods and gcForest algorithm, and at the same time, it optimizes the parameters for the lowest type II error as the first principle, and the highest AUC and accuracy as the second and third principles. GcForest can not only reflect the advantages of traditional statistical models in terms of interpretability and robustness but also take into account the advantages of deep learning models in terms of accuracy. Results: the validity of the hybrid default discrimination model is verified by three real open credit data sets of Australian, Japanese, and German in the UCI database. Conclusions: the performance of the gcForest is better than the current popular single classifiers such as ANN, and the common ensemble classifiers such as LightGBM, and CNNs in type II error, AUC, and accuracy. Besides, in comparison with other similar research results, the robustness and effectiveness of this model are further verified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF