Search

Consumer-directed care (CDC) is increasingly widespread among aged care service options in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. However, the evidence base regarding the programmatic and contextual factors that affect the outcome of CDC interventions is surprisingly small. This paper reports on a self-directed care approach for older Australians with complex care needs. A multimethods longitudinal comparative cohort study was employed comprising 4 survey tools and 56 semi-structured interviews. Participation rates were around 20%. A total of 185 (98 in the intervention and 87 in the control group) older people and carers were recruited at baseline. Eleven months later, 109 participants (59 in the intervention and 50 in the control group) completed the repeat measure. Attrition rates were around 40%. Data collection occurred between July 2010 and April 2012. The data suggest that intervention group participants were likely to be more satisfied with the way they were treated (P = 0.013), their care options (P = 0.014), the 'say' they had in their care (P < 0.001), the information they received regarding their care (P = 0.012), what they were achieving in life (P = 0.031), that the services changed their view on what could be achieved in life (P = 0.020) and with their standard of living (P = 0.008). The evaluation suggests that while only a very small segment of older people is interested in a voucher or cash option, a substantially larger group would like to have greater say over and more direct access to their care, without, however, assuming administrative and financial responsibilities. The paper concludes that a stepped capacity-building approach to CDC may improve the acceptability of CDC to older people and generate synergies that improve older people's care outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High costs of living and low wage growth in Australia have resulted in an increase in the number of people experiencing food insecurity, and a corresponding increase in the number of people accessing food aid. This research employs qualitative methods alongside standard methods to explore food security to investigate these issues in food aid settings in Victoria, Australia. The two aims of this study were, 1) to explore the profile of people who access food aid and 2) to explore the experiences of people accessing food aid. A convenience sample of people was recruited from organisations that distribute food aid from across the state. People in need of food aid typically self‐refer to charities, who then apply varied and localised criteria to manage access to the charitable service. Interviews were conducted with 78 participants between June 2018 and January 2019. Participants had been accessing food aid for 4 years on average (SD 5.7, range 1 month—40 years), most participants were female (n = 57, 73.1%), with an average age of 52.6 years (SD 15.9), and over half were born in Australia (n = 44, 56.4%). Most participants were in receipt of a government welfare payment (n = 75, 96.2%), and over 40% were living in private rental accommodation. Around two thirds of participants reported low or very low food security (n = 54, 67.5%). Participants reported a range of both positive and negative experiences accessing food aid. This study adds to the body of literature exploring food insecurity in high‐income settings and its persistence despite significant national economic prosperity. Current economic and political conditions in Australia mean that the reliance on food aid by welfare recipients is unlikely to decrease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective This study examined the opinions of nurses about the introduction of enrolled nurse medication administration and analyzed its impact on the medication error rate. Methods Data were collected using a survey and examination of incident reports regarding nursing medication errors. Nurses (registered nurse, enrolled nurse with medication endorsement, enrolled nurse) responded to survey items regarding the introduction of enrolled nurse medication administration. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Fischer's exact test, and chi-square analysis where appropriate. Results The majority of nurses (75.2%) supported enrolled nurse medication administration. However, differences in opinion were observed between registered nurse ( RN) and enrolled nurse with medication endorsement ( ENME) regarding clear understanding of responsibility and accountability ( RN: 47.2% vs. ENME: 77.8%; p =.033), and whether suitable education was provided ( RN: 34.7% vs. ENME: 73.7%; p =.012). Moreover, less than one-third of RNs agreed that the assessment process for EN medication endorsement clearly identified the competence of the ENME to administer medications. Nonetheless, nursing medication errors did not increase in the 12-month period after the introduction of enrolled nurse medication administration (pre: 314, post: 302). Conclusions The findings of this study suggest areas that should be addressed in the future, including assessment of competence and focused education about accountability and responsibility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]