Search

This paper discusses various water management issues facing federal, state, and local agencies charged with managing the water resources of the Rio Grande River Basin and its major tributaries. The Rio Grande—3,058 km (=1,900 mi) long—is the fourth longest river in the United States. The river's basin is 870,236 km2(=336,000 mi2) and for roughly two-thirds of its length it forms the United States–Mexican border. It is a major recreational resource providing world class trout fishing near its headwaters in Colorado's San Juan Mountains and shoreline, angling, and boating opportunities near the Colorado–New Mexico border. The Rio Grande is the principal tourist attraction of Big Bend National Park and flows through downtown Albuquerque and El Paso. Many reaches are wide and broad, but almost all are relatively shallow and not navigable by commercial ships. Nevertheless, it is one of the most important renewable water resources of the southwestern United States and North America. The issue of the “manageability” of the river in the face of social forces and disparate administrative jurisdictions that adversely impact Rio Grande flows is a thread linking various sections of the paper together. The length of the river; the fact that major reaches lie in Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas; and its unique role as an international boundary pose complex management problems. The allocation status quo formed by the complex nexus of existing river laws make it difficult to reshape Rio Grande management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The focus of this study is the 1938 Rio Grande Compact water supply. The compact is an interstate agreement signed in 1938 between the states of Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas to evenly apportion the waters of the Rio Grande Basin. A shortage in deliveries is at the center of a lawsuit that began in 2011, went to the Supreme Court in 2013, and has not been resolved. This research statistically characterized the differences between water available and water delivered by Colorado and New Mexico, signatories of the Rio Grande Compact with Texas, to understand changes over time and uncover potential autocorrelations. Unexpected changes in water deliveries can have serious financial impacts on communities, thus the importance of shedding light into the behavior of the differences between water available and delivered. One of the findings of the research was that the annual credit/debit time series for Colorado was significantly correlated with the current and immediately previous scheduled delivery as well as with itself in the two previous years, and the behavior is explained by a transfer function model (TFM). For New Mexico, the annual credit/debit series did not display a clear pattern; therefore, it was not possible to characterize its relationship with scheduled delivery with the method examined. This technical note contributes to the extensive body of literature of the Rio Grande Compact in a way no other study has done as well as contributing to the wealth of literature related to the use of the transfer function model in hydrology. The main contribution of the study is the methodology developed and used, which could be useful to other river systems and transboundary water sharing agreements. This research statistically characterized the differences between water available and water delivered, also known as credits and debits, by Colorado and New Mexico, signatories of the Rio Grande Compact with Texas, to understand changes over time and uncover potential autocorrelations. A legal conflict between the signatories of the compact has lasted over a decade. Texas alleges that New Mexico is extracting groundwater, shortening their share of the water. Unexpected changes in water deliveries can have serious financial impacts on communities so shedding light on the differences between water available and water delivered can contribute to the debate. One of the research findings was that the annual credit/debit time series for Colorado was significantly correlated with the current and immediately previous scheduled delivery as well as with itself in the two previous years, and the behavior is explained by a TFM. For New Mexico, the annual credit/debit series did not display a clear pattern; therefore, it was not possible to characterize its relationship with scheduled delivery with the method examined. The main contribution of the study is the methodology developed and used, specifically the TFM, which could be tweaked to fit other river systems and transboundary water sharing agreements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]