Search

Highway maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) planning is a multifaceted decision-making process that requires the consideration of multiple but often conflicting objectives. Traditionally, state highway agencies (SHAs) have focused on maximizing the condition of a pavement network or minimizing agency costs needed to keep the network at an acceptable physical and functional level of service. However, other objectives like minimizing the road user costs and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are seldom factored into the M&R decision-making process. In this paper, a mixed integer program that accounts for these three objectives is presented. The proposed model is then implemented on a subset network in Texas consisting of 100 pavement sections. The results demonstrate the Pareto-optimal relationships that exist between the road condition improvements, road user costs, and GHG emissions. Notably, there is a positive relationship between condition score improvements and the observed marginal GHG emissions from the case network implementation. Furthermore, this network's results indicate that GHG emissions from materials and construction contribute to the most significant proportion of the total estimated GHG emissions. The results of the sensitivity analysis confirm the observed trends in the network case examined and provide valuable insights concerning the impact of variability in the budget size. The principal contribution of this study is in providing an approach for highway decision-makers to perform trade-offs in road condition improvements, road user costs, and GHG emissions of alternate pavement M&R programs or policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]