Search

Athletes' participation in sports governance gains momentum at multiple levels and challenges the long-prevailing power relations in organised sport. At the same time, the sport-specific discourse on good governance extends to the field of anti-doping, following low levels of testing effectiveness, untransparent decision-making and ethical misconduct in leading anti-doping authorities. Adopting a case-oriented comparative approach between the National Anti-Doping Organisations (NADOs) of Germany (NADA) and Poland (POLADA), two consecutive data collection steps were applied in mixed-methods design to assess and compare the status quo, and to discuss the future development of athletes' participation in anti-doping through the lens of democratic processes in good governance research. First, document analysis showed important similarities and differences between the organisations' approaches to athletes' participation. Overall, NADA implements a more democratic and transparent approach than POLADA. Second, expert interviews revealed three key issues in relation to democratic forms of athletes' participation in the two NADOs: athletes' and their representatives' (limited) personal resources and engagement (individual); an adequate degree of codification and institutionalisation of athletes' representation on NADOs' internal bodies (organisational); and NADOs' operational (in-)dependence (political/systemic). Researchers and practitioners are recommended to further examine how NADOs' control functions over athletes and athletes' participation in their decision-making can be adequately balanced as part of aspirations to foster democratic governance in these organisations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]