1. CONSORT statement adherence and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials on deep caries management: a meta-research.
- Author
-
Elagami, Rokaia Ahmed, Reis, Thais Marchezini, Hassan, Mohamed Ahmed, Tedesco, Tamara Kerber, Braga, Mariana Minatel, Mendes, Fausto Medeiros, Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio, Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte, and Raggio, Daniela Prócida
- Subjects
TREATMENT of dental caries ,MEDICAL protocols ,RISK assessment ,SERIAL publications ,QUALITATIVE research ,RESEARCH funding ,MULTIPLE regression analysis ,LOGISTIC regression analysis ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,META-analysis ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,QUANTITATIVE research ,RESEARCH bias ,PEDIATRIC dentistry ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,MEDLINE ,ODDS ratio ,RESEARCH methodology ,STATISTICS ,RESEARCH ,ONLINE information services ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,DATA analysis software ,INTER-observer reliability ,EVALUATION ,STANDARDS - Abstract
Background: Recently, trials have supported changes in deep caries management. However, reporting might lack details, affecting interpretation and implementation. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the adherence to the CONSORT statement and the risk of bias of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on deep caries management published in pediatric dental journals. Methods: We searched PubMed for RCTs in six pediatric dental journals between 2010 and 2022, focusing on deep caries lesion management. Adherence to the CONSORT guideline and the risk of bias were assessed using a modified tool with 19 items; each scored from 0 to 2 (maximum of 38 points), and the Cochrane risk-of-bias (RoB 2) tool. We performed descriptive and regression analyses (α = 5%). Results: We analyzed 127 RCTs. The mean (standard deviation) CONSORT adherence score was 21.1 (6.7). Notably, 96.1% of the studies received a score of 2 for the "intervention" item, whereas 83.5% scored 0 for the "estimated effect size". The risk of bias assessment revealed that 40.2% of the RCTs were at high risk, 59% were at low risk, and 0.8% were at low risk. RCTs with a high risk of bias had lower CONSORT scores (p<0.001) than those with low or some concerns. RCTs published in journals without the endorsement of the CONSORT statement had lower scores than those in journals with the endorsement of the CONSORT statement. Older RCTs (6-10 years old and more than 10 years old) showed significantly lower CONSORT statement compliance than trials published recently within 5 years. Conclusion: Adherence to the CONSORT was relatively low among the investigated RCTs. Moreover, lower adherence to the CONSORT was associated with a higher risk of bias. Trial Registration: This study protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework - DOI (10.17605/OSF.IO/V6SYZ). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF