Search

Abstract: This paper uses sequential stochastic dominance procedures to compare the joint distribution of health and income across space and time. It is the first application of which we are aware of methods to compare multidimensional distributions of income and health using procedures that are robust to aggregation techniques. The paper’s approach is more general than comparisons of health gradients and does not require the estimation of health equivalent incomes. We illustrate the approach by contrasting Canada and the US using comparable data. Canada dominates the US over the bottom part of the bi-dimensional distribution of health and income, though not generally over the uni-dimensional distributions of health or income. The paper also finds that welfare for both Canadians and Americans has not unambiguously improved during the last decade over the joint distribution of income and health, in spite of the fact that the uni-dimensional distributions of income have clearly improved during that period. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: This paper uses a comparative case study of Canada and the USA to argue that, in order to fully understand the associations between population health and the socioeconomic environment we must begin to place importance on the dynamic aspect of these factors—examining them as they evolve over time. In particular, for institutional and policy shifts that often unfold over decades, population health must attend to these big, slow moving processes by adopting a historical perspective to the knowledge base. We compare Canada and the USA on basic health outcomes and a range of determinants of health for which routine data have been collected for all or most of the period between 1950 and the present. During the analysis that follows, we are able to establish that, at the level of society (i) greater economic well being and spending on health care does not yield better health outcomes, that (ii) public provision and income redistribution trump economic success where population health is concerned, and (iii) that the gradual development of public provision represents the buildup of social infrastructure that has long-lasting effects on health status. Our case study shows what can be gleaned from a comparative perspective and a long-term view. The long view allows us to detect the gradual divergence in health status between these two societies and to trace potential institutional causes that would otherwise go unnoticed. The perspective introduced here, and in particular the comparison of Canada and the USA, provides strong support for the use of cross-national comparative work, and a historical perspective on the investigation of societies that successfully support population health. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Is poverty necessary in one of the wealthiest and most advanced industrial nations? Whether poverty should be considered a public problem requiring expanded state involvement or a private and individual problem for which the state should accept minimal responsibility? The conservative ideology maintains that the social programs have helped to establish a culture of dependency that has institutionalized permanent poverty. It is believed that government programs to aid the poor encourage dependency and render them less and less capable of self-help, self discipline, and a successful entry into the work force. The belief that the causes of poverty are rooted in failed individuals and families rather than a failed public economy and discriminatory public policy requires a fundamental reexamination of the politics of poverty and the policy related to social services and redistribution of wealth. What is the extent of poverty in major Canadian cities? This paper attempts to examine the ideologies, and policy-programs of governments and the role of nongovernmental organizations in dealing with the problem of poverty in Canadian cities and argues for a major paradigm shift in social policy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]