Search

Background: This paper presents insight into the scale of mental health concerns for families who have a child or young person with a diagnosis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) living in any of the four nations of the United Kingdom (UK). The study's objective is to share the current experiences of those that responded to a charity survey and consider future work to improve mental health support. Methods: This work was initiated and led by five UK charity partner organisations working with families affected by JIA. Parents/carers of a child or young person with JIA, and young people with JIA, submitted self-completion online questionnaires. The questionnaire asked 19 core questions, with a focus on the mental health impact of having and living with a JIA diagnosis. Questionnaires were delivered via charity partner UK-wide mailing lists and social media. Results: Questionnaire were completed by 291 participants over a 3-week period in February 2022. The majority of respondents were parents (229, 79%), 103 children had been diagnosed for over six years (35%), and 131 (45%) received shared care between paediatric rheumatology centres. In total, 168 (59%) children and young people with JIA had received, were currently receiving or were waiting for mental health support. Parents reported that their child's diagnosis impacted their own mental health (218, 82%). Children and young people reported never being offered mental health support during appointments for JIA (157, 54%), and 71 (50%) of these had never received support. Conclusion: Children and young people with JIA have significant mental health sequelae from their diagnosis. Our findings found that nearly 60% of our respondents have had or are requiring mental health support, with significant numbers of parents/carers reporting difficulties in accessing care for their child's mental health or their own mental health, due to their child's diagnosis. This unique collaborative charity-led study, illustrates the importance of timely and accessible mental health support. Further work is needed to understand why best practice guidance for mental health support is not being met consistently and to identify how to embed it into standard rheumatology care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is an urgent need for clinically effective and cost-effective methods to manage antisocial and criminal behaviour in adolescents. Youth conduct disorder is increasingly prevalent in the UK and is associated with a range of negative outcomes. Quantitative systematic reviews carried out for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence have identified multisystemic therapy, an intensive, multimodal, home-based, family intervention for youth with serious antisocial behaviour, as one of the most promising interventions for reducing antisocial or offending behaviour and improving individual and family functioning. Previous international trials of multisystemic therapy have yielded mixed outcomes, and it is questionable to what extent positive US findings can be generalised to a wider UK mental health and juvenile justice context. This paper describes the protocol for the Systemic Therapy for At Risk Teens (START) trial, a multicentre UK-wide randomised controlled trial of multisystemic therapy in antisocial adolescents at high risk of out-of-home placement.Methods/design: The trial is being conducted at 10 sites across the UK. Seven hundred participants and their families will be recruited and randomised on a 1:1 basis to multisystemic therapy or management as usual. Treatments are offered over a period of 3 to 5 months, with follow-up to 18 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome is out-of-home placement at 18 months. Secondary outcomes include offending rates, total service and criminal justice sector costs, and participant well-being and educational outcomes. Data will be gathered from police computer records, the National Pupil Database, and interview and self-report measures administered to adolescents, parents and teachers. Outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, using a logistic regression with random effects for the primary outcome and Cox regressions and linear mixed-effects models for secondary outcomes depending on whether the outcome is time-to-event or continuous.Discussion: The START trial is a pragmatic national trial of sufficient size to evaluate multisystemic therapy, to inform policymakers, service commissioners, professionals, service users and their families about its potential in the UK. It will also provide data on the clinical and cost-effectiveness of usual services provided to youth with serious antisocial behaviour problems.Trial Registration: ISRCTN77132214. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Rituximab is an anti-CD20 chimeric monoclonal antibody that depletes pre-plasma B cells. It is used in paediatric rheumatology for conditions including juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (jSLE), juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM), vasculitides and refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). We aim to describe the cohort of patients treated with rituximab in the Scottish Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology Network (SPARN) in a 5-year period, and assess the need for a network guideline. Methods A review of paper and electronic case records. Patients seen within the SPARN network who received Rituximab between 2014 and 2018 were included. Results Vasculitis Rituximab was given to 16 patients in 5 different SPARN centres between 2014 and 2018. Male: Female ratio was 1:4.3. Mean age at first dose of rituximab was 12.75 years. Mean disease duration pre rituximab was 1 year. 8 (50%) patients had jSLE, 7 multisystem and 1 isolated lupus nephritis. 3 had ANCA-positive vasculitis and 5 had other conditions. (1 had RF+ve JIA; 1 severe panuveitis; 1 had an unspecified autoinflammatory condition; 1 had COPA syndrome with severe interstitial lung disease and 1 had autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED). Documentation of pre-rituximab checks was poor. Baseline bloods were done in all 16 patients. 11 patients had lymphocyte subsets and 13 immunoglobulins documented. Disease-specific antibodies were measured in all patients in whom applicable (11). 11 had a chest x-ray prior to rituximab. In 9 cases a pre-rituximab pregnancy test was indicated: none were documented. In only 3 patients was a pre-rituximab history of recent infections documented. In 8 patients a discussion regarding treatment risks and benefits was documented. Post-infusion lymphocyte subset monitoring was variable but documented in 15. 1 patient was never B cell deplete. 9 never fully reconstituted. RTX dose information was available for 14. All received doses of 750mg/m2 with 6 having the dose capped at 1g. Dose frequency information was available for all. The majority (9) received 2 doses. Of the rest, 1 patient received a single dose. 3 received 3 doses, 2 had 4 and 1 had 5. All patients in whom information was available, received pre-medication with paracetamol, chlorphenamine and methylprednisolone (n = 14). 4 patients had side effects noted (rash/itch in 1, anaphylaxis in 1, facial flushing in 1 and post-infusion infection in 1). Clinical response was clearly documented in 8 patients, 7 of whom showed clinical improvement (2 had systemic jSLE, 2 had ANCA +ve vasculitis, 1 had isolated lupus nephritis, 1 had COPA syndrome and 1 had RF+ JIA). Conclusion Rituximab is used for a range of conditions and in a number of centres within SPARN. This review highlights variation in and poor documentation of pre-rituximab discussions and investigations, prescribing, monitoring and response. A SPARN rituximab protocol is being developed to address this. Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]