Search

Objective: Some bibliography supports a diagnostic and therapeutic delay in women with high cardiovascular risk. The objective of this paper was to know the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality in a cohort with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS); analyze possible differences in gender and place of residence, regarding the performance of primary angioplasties in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD)., Methods: Population cohort study, with SIDIAP database (Sistema de Información para la Investigación en Atención Primaria), in primary care in Catalonia. We selected people of both sexes, between 35-75 years old, exempt from CVD at the beginning (2009), fulfilling MetS criteria (NCEP-ATPIII-National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III- criteria diagnoses). We performed descriptive statistics, and ANOVA and Chi-square test to evaluate differences between variables., Results: 167,673 people met MetS criteria (5.2% of the population), 105,969 men (63.2%). 22% of the population belonged to rural areas. Those urban areas with the most socioeconomic differences (urban-1 and urban-5) exhibited the highest incidences of CVD and IHD. We registered 51,129 CVD (30.7%) of which 8,889 were acute myocardial infarctions (AMI) (5,3%) and 24,284 were IHD (14,5%). 1.758 primary angioplasties procedures were performed, 1,467 in men and 291 in women, representing, respectively, 4.4% and 0.9% (p<0.005)., Conclusions: The incidence of IHD and AMI in subjects with MetS is high in Catalonia. There is a difference in the angioplasties performed, according to sex and place of residence. Probably a practical implication would be to detect IHD in time in women with MetS, so that they can benefit from revascularization therapy in the same way as men., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Objective: The benefit-risk balance of statins and ezetimibe as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is controversial in elderly patients due to the doubts about their effectiveness and certainty about adverse effects. The aim of this paper was to analyze health outcomes of a statin and ezetimibe deprescription strategy in patients aged 75 or older treated with these drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease., Methods: An observational ambispective cohort study was made to evaluate health outcomes after the implementation of a strategy for deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in patients aged 75 or older who take these drugs for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. To avoid the risk of bias due to non-random assignment of patients to different groups, a propensity score will be calculated for each patient using logistic regression. The outcome of interest will be the deprescription or not of statins or ezetimibe. Time to hospital admission or death from any cause and other variables related to health outcomes will be analysed. Groups with and without statin or ezetimibe deprescription will be compared by survival analysis using Cox regression to estimate the hazard ratio., Conclusions: It is expected to obtain health outcomes of the strategy of deprescribing statins and ezetimibe in primary prevention in patients aged 75 or older. They will provide information on the advisability of continuing the strategy.