1. Hjorlandのドメイン分析と存在論: Putnam及びGabrielの存在論との比較.
- Author
-
横山幹子
- Subjects
- *
PHOTOREALISM , *LIBRARY science , *REALISM , *ORGANIZATIONAL research , *RELATIVITY , *SUBJECTIVITY , *MONISM - Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that there can be different ontologies that support the domain analysis that Birger Hj0rland argues for in library and information science research and that meet the realist demands he wants to seek, but differ as to what is recognized as an entity. Methods: This paper is a literature-based analysis, comparing Hj0rland's literature on domain analysis and ontology with that of Hilary Putnam and Markus Gabriel, focusing on their similarities and differences. Results: Hj0rland notes the importance of domain analysis in knowledge organization research. Domain analysis is a research method that recognizes multiple domains and emphasizes the social and historical perspectives in each domain. However, Hj0rland avoids relativism and subjectivism in library and information science research and advocates pragmatic realism and physical monism. Pragmatic realism is the view that while what we consider to exist depends on a theory or paradigm, we cannot freely create reality, and the acceptance of a theory requires a pragmatic element to better explain events. Physical monism recognizes only physical entities. However, there may be other ontologies that support domain analysis and emphasize social and historical perspectives while avoiding relativism and subjectivism, as Hj0rland aims to do. Candidates include Putnam's ontology and Gabriel's ontology. In particular, Gabriel's pluralist new realism, which argues for a reality that is neither without observers nor with only observers, could be a promising candidate. However, the relationship of domain analysis to Hj0rland's claim of physical monism remains to be examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF