Search

The HIV response is hampered by many obstacles to progression along the HIV care cascade, with men, in particular, experiencing different forms of disruption. One group of men, whose stories remain untold, are those who have succumbed to HIV-related illness. In this paper, we explore how next-of-kin account for the death of a male relative. We conducted 26 qualitative after-death interviews with family members of male PLHIV who had recently died from HIV in health and demographic surveillance sites in Malawi, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Zimbabwe and South Africa. The next-of-kin expressed frustration about the defiance of their male relative to disclose his HIV status and ask for support, and attributed this to shame, fear and a lack of self-acceptance of HIV diagnosis. Next-of-kin painted a picture of their male relative as rebellious. Some claimed that their deceased relative deliberately ignored instructions received by the health worker. Others described their male relatives as unable to maintain caring relationships that would avail day-to-day treatment partners, and give purpose to their lives. Through these accounts, next-of-kin vocalised the perceived rebellious behaviour of these men, and in the process of doing so neutralised their responsibility for the premature death of their relative. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Little is known about how CD4 and viral load testing have evolved following implementation of universal test and treat (UTT) in African settings. We reviewed World Health Organization (WHO) guidance from 2013 to 2018, and compared it against national HIV policies in Malawi, Tanzania and South Africa. Three surveys rounds were conducted in 2013, 2016 and 2017–2018 in 33 health facilities across the three settings to assess implementation of national policies on the use of biological markers. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 26 HIV policymakers or programme managers, 21 providers and 66 people living with HIV to explore understandings and experiences of these tests. Various factors influenced adoption and implementation of WHO guidance, including historical policies on CD4 counts, governance issues, supply chain challenges and funding mechanisms. Facility-level practices relating to the use of these tests often diverged from national policies. Patients and providers valued both tests, but did not always understand their roles. In addition to continued support for scaling-up viral load testing, renewed focus should be placed on the ongoing value of point-of-care CD4 tests in the UTT era, including its role in assessing disease progression and informing clinical management of cases to reduce HIV-related mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]