Search

Background: Virtual reality (VR) offers much potential for learning, but it challenges learners' orientation. Objectives: This paper investigates whether it is possible to use light or movement cues to facilitate orientation in a search task in a desktop‐VR environment so that participants can better attend to the learning content presented simultaneously. Methods: In two pre‐registered online experiments, we investigated the effects of cueing (light and movement) on search time, learning, and several evaluation variables. Participants were asked to find tools in a virtual workshop, while information about the respective tool was narrated. Experiment 1 (N = 60) used a within‐subject design, that is, the objects were alternately highlighted by light, movement or not. For Experiment 2 (N = 159) the narration was substantially shortened, and a between‐subject design was used. Cognitive load and presence were measured additionally. Results and conclusions: In Experiment 1, only the movement cue decreased search time, indicating automatic guidance of learners' attention. There was no effect of cueing on learning, which may be due to the average search time being substantially shorter than the narration, leaving sufficient time to attend to the narration exclusively. In Experiment 2 search times were significantly faster for both cueing methods, but only the light cue resulted in better learning outcomes, which could be explained by the slightly lower presence in the movement cue condition. Implications: Results imply that it is important to develop cues that automatically guide attention without reducing presence. Lay Description: What is already known about this topic: Virtual reality (VR) offers a lot of opportunities for the integration of educational scenarios.VR is challenging for learners with regard to orientation in a 360° environment.Regarding learning outcomes, research on the effects of cues to highlight important content in a 360° environment is still rare.Presence, defined as the feeling of being there in a VR environment, is an important prerequisite for learning in VR. What this paper adds: The influence of light and movement cues on search times and learning outcomes in a desktop‐VR environment was tested.Movement cues can reliably reduce search times (indicating successful orientation), whereas light cues only reduced search times in predictable scenarios.In a predictable scenario, light cues enhanced learning outcomes compared with movement cues.Movement cues reduced presence, which is one potential reason why movement cues did not improve learning. Implications for practice and/or policy: Using light cues might assist orientation and enhance overall performance in predictable scenarios (i.e., when learners know what kind of cue to expect).In an unpredictable setting with variable cues, light cues did not facilitate orientation, whereas movement cues did.However, movement cues reduced presence, which may have negatively affected learning outcomes. It is important to develop cueing methods that also work in more unpredictable settings, but that do not reduce presence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of the current study was to investigate the robustness of the human movement effect and its stability over time by comparing the effectiveness of dynamic and static presentations on acquisition and retention of a gross motor skill. Methods: One hundred and seven first‐year students studying for the certificate in Physical Education course were randomly divided into three groups: (i) static pictures (N = 32), (ii) enriched static pictures with arrows (N = 34), and (iii) video (N = 41). They were instructed to observe the demonstration of the Ippon‐Seoi‐Nage (a Judo technique) and reproduce it during the acquisition phase or after a delay of 1 week during the retention phase. Results and Conclusions: The results showed that enriched static pictures (with arrows) resulted in more efficient learning than the static pictures (without arrows). Most importantly, it was shown that learners receiving the video presentation outperformed learners receiving the static presentations, with regard to acquisition and retention, indicating therefore a robust human movement effect. Implications: These findings provide confirmation of the superiority of video presentations for teaching and learning motor skills involving the entire human body. Lay Description: What is already known about this topic:External visualizations are broadly used in Physical education (PE) and sport context.Static visualizations are regarded as the fundamental tools used by PE teachers to communicate visual information that is difficult to verbally describe.Increasing use of dynamic visualizations such as videos largely supplanted the use of static pictures in PE contextWhat this paper adds:Comparing the effectiveness of static pictures and digital videos in tactical learningExploring the human movement effect and its stability over timeImplications for practice and/or policy:The human movement effect is a robust phenomenon not only when it is evaluated immediately after the learning phase but also after a notable delay.Dynamic visualizations remain the most powerful computer‐based technique by which people can learn complex motor skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]