Search

Aims: To evaluate the implementation process of a multi‐site trial of a novel discharge teaching intervention. Design: Hybrid type 3 trial. Methods: A discharge teaching intervention for older adults was implemented in medical units from August 2020 to August 2021 with 30 nurse participants. The implementation process was guided by behaviour change frameworks. Outcome data comprised determinants of nurses' behaviours related to teaching and the acceptability, appropriateness, feasibility of the intervention and frequency of teaching activities received by the participants. This study adheres to StaRI and TIDieR reporting guidelines. Results: Twelve of 18 determinants of nurses' behaviour domains improved post‐implementation. Being trained reinforced nurses' knowledge and skills in patient teaching. Practicing the intervention increased their awareness on the gaps between evidence‐based teaching principles and their actual practice. The intervention was considered acceptable and moderately appropriate and feasible. Conclusion: A theoretically informed implementation process can influence nurses' perceptions and behaviours related to discharge teaching by targeting specific behaviour domains. Practice change to improve discharge teaching will require organizational support from nursing management. No Patient or Public Contribution: Although the conceptual foundations of the intervention tested in this study were informed by the priorities and experience of patients, this population was not directly involved in the design and conduct of the study. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04253665. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: There are barriers to midwives engaging in conversations about alcohol with pregnant women. Our aim was to capture the views of midwives and service users to co‐create strategies to address these barriers. Design: Qualitative description. Methods: Structured Zoom‐based focus group interviews of midwives and service users where we presented known barriers and sought solutions to midwives discussing alcohol use in antenatal settings. Data collection took place between July and August 2021. Results: Fourteen midwives and six service users attended five focus groups. Barriers considered were as follows: (i) lack of awareness of guidelines, (ii) poor skills in difficult conversations, (iii) lack of confidence, (iv) lack of belief in existing evidence, (v) women would not listen to their advice, and (vi) alcohol conversations were not considered part of their role. Five strategies to address barriers to midwives discussing alcohol with pregnant women were identified. These were as follows: Training that included mothers of children with Foetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder, champion midwives, a service user questionnaire about alcohol for completion before the consultation, questions about alcohol added to the maternity data capture template and a structured appraisal to provide a means of audit and feedback on their alcohol dialogue with women. Conclusions: Co‐creation involving providers and users of maternity services yielded theoretically underpinned pragmatic strategies to support midwives to ask advise assist about alcohol during antenatal care. Future research will test if the strategies can be delivered in antenatal care settings, and if they are acceptable to service providers and service users. Impact: If these strategies are effective in addressing barriers to midwives discussing alcohol with pregnant women, this could support women to abstain from alcohol during pregnancy, thus reducing alcohol‐related maternal and infant harm. Patient and public contribution: Service users were involved in the design and execution of the study, considering data, supporting intervention design and delivery and dissemination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]