1. The trade-off between total harvestable production and concentration of the economically useful yield component: cane tonnage and sugar content
- Author
-
James H. Cock, Alberto Palma, and Carlos A Luna
- Subjects
biology ,Crop yield ,Final product ,food and beverages ,Soil Science ,Pulp and paper industry ,biology.organism_classification ,Agronomy ,Yield (wine) ,Production (economics) ,Sugar beet ,Product (category theory) ,Sugar ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Productivity ,Mathematics - Abstract
In several crop species, the harvested part of the crop (primary product) must be processed to extract the economically useful part (final product). The standard evaluation of new technology in these crops is normally based on the quantity of final product per unit land area (final production), which is the product of primary production and the proportion of final product that is extracted from the primary product (extracted product). This may be valid in terms of biological productivity, but in terms of commercial viability it is not satisfactory. Costs of harvest transport and initial processing of the primary product are normally more closely related to total primary production than to final production. Identical values for final production may be obtained through high primary production combined with low extracted product or vice versa. In the latter case, where primary production is less, the costs of harvest, transport and initial processing per unit final product will be less. The standard evaluation, which gives equal weightage to primary production and extracted product, does not detect these differences in costs. A simple model is developed for sugar production from cane to make valid comparisons between the profitability of different treatments. The model can readily be adapted for other crops such as sugar beet, oil palm and cassava.
- Published
- 2000