2,929 results
Search Results
2. Patient satisfaction with the implementation of electronic medical Records in the Western Region, Saudi Arabia, 2018
- Author
-
R. M. Wali, R. M. Alqahtani, S. K. Alharazi, S. A. Bukhari, and S. M. Quqandi
- Subjects
Patients’ satisfaction ,Electronic medical record ,Paper medical record ,Physician-patient communication ,Primary healthcare centers ,Medicine (General) ,R5-920 - Abstract
Abstract Background The implementation of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system initiated a significant transition in the healthcare system from traditional paper-based medical records to a digital version. Though EMR offers several benefits compared to Paper Medical Records (PMR), patient satisfaction with the EMR has been an area of concern. The objective of this study is to explore patient satisfaction with the EMR compared to the PMR of patients attending five Primary Healthcare Centers in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted with patients who attended five Primary Health Care centers (PHCs) in the Western Region during 2018. A sample of 377 participants was invited to complete a self-developed structured questionnaire with multiple choice and Likert Scale questions. The questionnaire was distributed to participants in the PHC waiting areas. Results The sample size realized as (n = 377) participants, the majority (65.0%) were female. The overall patient satisfaction was 3.708. Patient satisfaction with the EMR was statistically significant compared to the PMR (3.7241 vs. 3.6919, p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Context and general practitioner decision-making - a scoping review of contextual influence on antibiotic prescribing.
- Author
-
Al-Azzawi, Resha, Halvorsen, Peder A., and Risør, Torsten
- Subjects
CINAHL database ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,JUDGMENT (Psychology) ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,UNCERTAINTY ,PRIMARY health care ,DRUG prescribing ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,DECISION making in clinical medicine ,PHYSICIAN practice patterns ,LITERATURE reviews ,MEDLINE ,ANTIBIOTICS ,MEDICAL logic - Abstract
Background: How contextual factors may influence GP decisions in real life practice is poorly understood. The authors have undertaken a scoping review of antibiotic prescribing in primary care, with a focus on the interaction between context and GP decision-making, and what it means for the decisions made. Method: The authors searched Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases for English language articles published between 1946 and 2019, focusing on general practitioner prescribing of antibiotics. Articles discussing decision-making, reasoning, judgement, or uncertainty in relation to antibiotic prescribing were assessed. As no universal definition of context has been agreed, any papers discussing terms synonymous with context were reviewed. Terms encountered included contextual factors, non-medical factors, and non-clinical factors. Results: Three hundred seventy-seven full text articles were assessed for eligibility, resulting in the inclusion of 47. This article documented the experiences of general practitioners from over 18 countries, collected in 47 papers, over the course of 3 decades. Contextual factors fell under 7 themes that emerged in the process of analysis. These were space and place, time, stress and emotion, patient characteristics, therapeutic relationship, negotiating decisions and practice style, managing uncertainty, and clinical experience. Contextual presence was in every part of the consultation process, was vital to management, and often resulted in prescribing. Conclusion: Context is essential in real life decision-making, and yet it does not feature in current representations of clinical decision-making. With an incomplete picture of how doctors make decisions in real life practice, we risk missing important opportunities to improve decision-making, such as antibiotic prescribing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. A pay for performance scheme in primary care: Meta-synthesis of qualitative studies on the provider experiences of the quality and outcomes framework in the UK.
- Author
-
Khan, Nagina, Rudoler, David, McDiarmid, Mary, and Peckham, Stephen
- Subjects
ATTITUDE (Psychology) ,CINAHL database ,CONTINUUM of care ,LABOR incentives ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,MEDICAL personnel ,MEDLINE ,PAY for performance ,ORGANIZATIONAL change ,GENERAL practitioners ,PRIMARY health care ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,ORGANIZATIONAL structure ,PROFESSIONALISM ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,META-synthesis - Abstract
Background: The Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) is an incentive scheme for general practice, which was introduced across the UK in 2004. The Quality and Outcomes Framework is one of the biggest pay for performance (P4P) scheme in the world, worth £691 million in 2016/17. We now know that P4P is good at driving some kinds of improvement but not others. In some areas, it also generated moral controversy, which in turn created conflicts of interest for providers. We aimed to undertake a meta-synthesis of 18 qualitative studies of the QOF to identify themes on the impact of the QOF on individual practitioners and other staff. Methods: We searched 5 electronic databases, Medline, Embase, Healthstar, CINAHL and Web of Science, for qualitative studies of the QOF from the providers' perspective in primary care, published in UK between 2004 and 2018. Data was analysed using the Schwartz Value Theory as a theoretical framework to analyse the published papers through the conceptual lens of Professionalism. A line of argument synthesis was undertaken to express the synthesis. Results: We included 18 qualitative studies that where on the providers' perspective. Four themes were identified; 1) Loss of autonomy, control and ownership; 2) Incentivised conformity; 3) Continuity of care, holism and the caring role of practitioners' in primary care; and 4) Structural and organisational changes. Our synthesis found, the Values that were enhanced by the QOF were power, achievement, conformity, security, and tradition. The findings indicated that P4P schemes should aim to support Values such as benevolence, self-direction, stimulation, hedonism and universalism, which professionals ranked highly and have shown to have positive implications for Professionalism and efficiency of health systems. Conclusions: Understanding how practitioners experience the complexities of P4P is crucial to designing and delivering schemes to enhance and not compromise the values of professionals. Future P4P schemes should aim to permit professionals with competing high priority values to be part of P4P or other quality improvement initiatives and for them to take on an 'influencer role' rather than being 'responsive agents'. Through understanding the underlying Values and not just explicit concerns of professionals, may ensure higher levels of acceptance and enduring success for P4P schemes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care.
- Author
-
Paneque, Milena, Turchetti, Daniela, Jackson, Leigh, Lunt, Peter, Houwink, Elisa, and Skirton, Heather
- Subjects
CINAHL database ,CLINICAL competence ,CONFIDENCE ,ERIC (Information retrieval system) ,GENETICS ,PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems ,INTELLECT ,MEDLINE ,GENERAL practitioners ,RESEARCH funding ,CONTINUING medical education ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,EVIDENCE-based medicine - Abstract
Background: At least 10 % of patients seen in primary care are said to have a condition in which genetics has an influence. However, patients at risk of genetic disease may not be recognised, while those who seek advice may not be referred or managed appropriately. Primary care practitioners lack knowledge of genetics and genetic testing relevant for daily practice and feel inadequate to deliver genetic services. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate genetics educational interventions in the context of primary care. Methods: Following the process for systematic reviews developed by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, we conducted a search of five relevant electronic databases. Primary research papers were eligible for inclusion if they included data on outcomes of interventions regarding genetics education for primary care practitioners. The results from each paper were coded and grouped under themes. Results: Eleven studies were included in the review. The five major themes identified inductively (post hoc) were: prior experience, changes in confidence, changes in knowledge, changes in practice, satisfaction and feedback. In five of the studies, knowledge of practitioners was improved following the educational programmes, but this tended to be in specific topic areas, while practitioner confidence improved in six studies. However, there was little apparent change to practice. Conclusions: There are insufficient studies of relevant quality to inform educational interventions in genetics for primary care practitioners. Educational initiatives should be assessed using changes in practice, as well as in confidence and knowledge, to determine if they are effective in causing significant changes in practice in genetic risk assessment and appropriate management of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. A systematic review of approaches to improve practice, detection and treatment of unhealthy alcohol use in primary health care: a role for continuous quality improvement
- Author
-
Dzidowska, Monika, Lee, K. S. Kylie, Wylie, Claire, Bailie, Jodie, Percival, Nikki, Conigrave, James H., Hayman, Noel, and Conigrave, Katherine M.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Integrating clinician support with intervention design as part of a programme testing stratified care for musculoskeletal pain in general practice.
- Author
-
Protheroe, Joanne, Saunders, Benjamin, Hill, Jonathan C., Chudyk, Adrian, Foster, Nadine E., Bartlam, Bernadette, Wathall, Simon, and Cooper, Vincent
- Subjects
MYALGIA ,EVALUATION of human services programs ,FAMILY medicine ,INTEGRATED health care delivery - Abstract
Background: Stratified care involves subgrouping patients based on key characteristics, e.g. prognostic risk, and matching these subgroups to early treatment options. The STarT-MSK programme developed and tested a new stratified primary care intervention for patients with common musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions in general practice. Stratified care involves changing General Practitioners' (GPs) behaviour, away from the current 'stepped' care approach to identifying early treatment options matched to patients' risk of persistent pain. Changing healthcare practice is challenging, and to aid the successful delivery of stratified care, education and support for GPs was required. This paper details the iterative development of a clinician support package throughout the lifespan of the programme, to support GPs in delivering the stratified care intervention. We argue that clinician support is a crucial aspect of the intervention itself, which is often overlooked. Methods: Qualitative research with patients and GPs identified barriers and facilitators to the adoption of stratified care, which were mapped onto the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Identified domains were 'translated' into an educational paradigm, and an initial version of the support package developed. This was further refined following a feasibility and pilot RCT, and a finalised support package was developed for the main RCT. Results: The clinician support package comprised face-to-face sessions combining adult-learning principles with behaviour change theory in a multimethod approach, which included group discussion, simulated consultations, patient vignettes and model consultation videos. Structured support for GPs was crucial to facilitate fidelity and, ultimately, a successful trial. Clinician support is a two-way process– the study team can learn from and adapt to specific local factors and issues not previously identified. The support from senior clinicians was required to ensure 'buy in'. Monitoring of GP performance, provision of regular feedback and remedial support are important aspects of effective clinician support. Conclusion: Designing effective clinician support from the onset of trial intervention design, in an evidence-based, theory-informed manner, is crucial to encourage active engagement and intervention fidelity within the trial, enabling the delivery of a robust and reliable proof-of-principle trial. We offer practical recommendations for future general practice interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of common respiratory tract infections in relation to microbiological profiles in rural health facilities in China: implications for antibiotic stewardship.
- Author
-
Shen, Xingrong, Shen, Jilu, Pan, Yaping, Cheng, Jing, Chai, Jing, Bowker, Karen, MacGowan, Alasdair, Oliver, Isabel, Lambert, Helen, and Wang, Debing
- Subjects
PHARYNGITIS diagnosis ,ANTIBIOTICS ,RURAL hospitals ,RESEARCH methodology ,SPUTUM ,RESPIRATORY infections ,CULTURES (Biology) ,BRONCHITIS ,DRUG prescribing ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,MICROBIOLOGICAL techniques ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,MEDICAL prescriptions ,PHYSICIAN practice patterns ,DRUG resistance in microorganisms - Abstract
Background: This paper tries to describe prevalence and patterns of antibiotics prescription and bacteria detection and sensitivity to antibiotics in rural China and implications for future antibiotic stewardship. Methods: The study was implemented in one village clinic and one township health center in each of four rural residential areas in Anhui Province, China. It used mixed-methods comprising non-participative observations, exit-survey and microbiological study. Observations were conducted to record clinical diagnosis and antibiotic prescription. Semi-structured questionnaire survey was used to collect patient's sociodemographic information and symptoms. Sputum and throat swabs were collected for bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. Results: A total of 1068 (51.0% male vs 49.0% female) patients completed the study with diagnosis of respiratory tract infection (326,30.5%), bronchitis/tracheitis (249,23.3%), pharyngitis (119,11.1%) and others (374, 35.0%). They provided 683 sputum and 385 throat swab specimens. Antibiotics were prescribed for 88% of the RTI patients. Of all the specimens tested, 329 (31%) were isolated with bacteria. The most frequently detected bacteria were K. pneumonia (24% in all specimens), H. influenza (16%), H. parainfluenzae (15%), P. aeruginosa (6%), S.aureus (5%), M. catarrhalis (3%) and S. pneumoniae (2%). Conclusions: The study establishes the feasibility of conducting microbiological testing outside Tier 2 and 3 hospitals in rural China. It reveals that prescription of antibiotics, especially broad-spectrum and combined antibiotics, is still very common and there is a clear need for stewardship programs aimed at both reducing the number of prescriptions and promoting single and narrow-spectrum antibiotics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. The prevalence, reasons and attitudes for the practice of informal medicine.
- Author
-
Amran, Menashe Meni, Kopit, Avital Bilitzky, Kranc, Hannan Ariel, and Peleg, Roni
- Subjects
FAMILY medicine ,MEDICAL care ,PATIENTS ,GENERAL practitioners ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background: Informal medicine, entailing undocumented medical advice, has been described in diverse medical disciplines and geographical regions. We assessed the current prevalence and characteristics of informal medical consulting, the reasons physicians provide it, and their attitudes toward it. Methods: We conducted a survey among family physicians in Israel, a country with a national health insurance system. A questionnaire was emailed to all primary care physicians in the two largest HMOs in southern Israel. Fifteen questions addressed the prevalence, practice and attitudes to informal medical consulting. Ten questions assessed demographics and professional experience. Results: Of 143 respondents (mean age 41 years), 55% were women. Ninety-five percent of the respondents reported requesting informal medical consulting from other physicians. Fifty-four percent reported often providing informal consulting to family and friends; and an additional 27% reported doing so under exceptional circumstances. The main reasons given for informal consulting requests were availability and accessibility (81% of respondents), and not financial savings. Only 17.5% stated being in favor of informal consulting for family and friends. Only 11% expressed feeling satisfaction after providing such consultation; 49% expressed discomfort. Sixty-six percent thought a position paper on informal consulting to family and friends is needed. Conclusions: Our survey of primary care physicians shows very frequent informal medical consulting, despite high dissatisfaction with such, and an interest in receiving guidelines on this practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. The effect of feedback to general practitioners on quality of care for people with type 2 diabetes. A systematic review of the literature.
- Author
-
Guldberg, Trine Lignell, Lauritzen, Torsten, Kristensen, Jette Kolding, and Vedsted, Peter
- Subjects
TYPE 2 diabetes ,PEOPLE with diabetes ,GENERAL practitioners ,MEDICAL informatics ,HEALTH status indicators - Abstract
Background: There have been numerous efforts to improve and assure the quality of treatment and follow-up of people with Type 2 diabetes (PT2D) in general practice. Facilitated by the increasing usability and validity of guidelines, indicators and databases, feedback on diabetes care is a promising tool in this aspect. Our goal was to assess the effect of feedback to general practitioners (GPs) on the quality of care for PT2D based on the available literature. Methods: Systematic review searches were conducted using October 2008 updates of Medline (Pubmed), Cochrane library and Embase databases. Additional searches in reference lists and related articles were conducted. Papers were included if published in English, performed as randomized controlled trials, studying diabetes, having general practice as setting and using feedback to GPs on diabetes care. The papers were assessed according to predefined criteria. Results: Ten studies complied with the inclusion criteria. Feedback improved the care for PT2D, particularly process outcomes such as foot exams, eye exams and Hba1c measurements. Clinical outcomes like lowering of blood pressure, Hba1c and cholesterol levels were seen in few studies. Many process and outcome measures did not improve, while none deteriorated. Meta analysis was unfeasible due to heterogeneity of the studies included. Two studies used electronic feedback. Conclusion: Based on this review, feedback seems a promising tool for quality improvement in diabetes care, but more research is needed, especially of electronic feedback. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Converting habits of antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections in German primary care (CHANGE-3) - process evaluation of a complex intervention.
- Author
-
Poß-Doering, R., Kuehn, L., Kamradt, M., Glassen, K., Fleischhauer, Th., Kaufmann-Kolle, P., Koeppen, M., Wollny, A., Altiner, A., and Wensing, M.
- Subjects
ANTIBIOTICS ,ANTI-infective agents ,DRUG resistance in microorganisms ,DRUG prescribing ,INTERVIEWING ,RESEARCH methodology ,EVALUATION of medical care ,PRIMARY health care ,RESPIRATORY infections ,PHYSICIAN practice patterns ,QUALITATIVE research ,QUANTITATIVE research ,THEMATIC analysis ,HEALTH literacy ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,ANTIMICROBIAL stewardship - Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial resistance remains a global challenge. In Germany, the national health agenda supports measures that enhance the appropriate, guideline-oriented use of antibiotics. The study "Converting Habits of Antibiotic Use for Respiratory Tract Infections in German Primary Care (CHANGE-3)" aimed at a sustainable reduction of antimicrobial resistance through converting patterns of prescribing practice and use of antibiotics and an increase in health literacy in primary care patients, practice teams, and in the general public. Embedded in a cluster-randomized trial of a multifaceted implementation program, a process evaluation focused on the uptake of program components to assess the fidelity of the implementation program in the CHANGE-3 study and to understand utilization of its educational components. Methods: A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods was used. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with General Practitioners, Medical Assistants, patients treated for respiratory tract infection and outreach visitors who had carried out individual outreach visits. A two-wave written survey (T1: 5 months after start, T2: 16 months after start) was conducted in general practitioners and medical assistants. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic framework analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze survey data. Results: Uptake of intervention components was heterogenous. Across all components, the uptake reported by General Practitioners varied from 20 to 88% at T1 and 31 to 63% at T2. Medical Assistants reported uptake from 22 to 70% at T1 and 6 to 69% at T2. Paper-based components could by and large be integrated in daily practice (64 to 90% in T1; 41 to 93% in T2), but uptake of digital components was low. A one-time outreach visit provided thematic information and feedback regarding actual prescribing, but due to time constraints were received with reluctance by practice teams. Patients were largely unaware of program components, but assumed that information and education could promote health literacy regarding antibiotics use. Conclusions: The process evaluation contributed to understanding the applicability of the delivered educational components with regards to the appropriate use of antibiotics. Future research efforts need to identify the best mode of delivery to reach the targeted population. Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN15061174. Registered 13 July 2018 – Retrospectively registered [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Piloting electronic screening forms in primary care: findings from a mixed methods study to identify patients eligible for low dose CT lung cancer screening.
- Author
-
O'Brien, Mary Ann, Sullivan, Frank, Carson, Andrea, Siddiqui, Rabiya, Syed, Saddaf, and Paszat, Lawrence
- Subjects
COMPARATIVE studies ,EXPERIENCE ,HOSPITAL medical staff ,IDENTIFICATION ,INTERVIEWING ,LUNG tumors ,MEDICAL appointments ,MEDICAL records ,MEDICAL screening ,MEDICAL practice ,PATIENTS ,GENERAL practitioners ,PRIMARY health care ,RADIATION doses ,STATISTICAL sampling ,SMOKING cessation ,TOMOGRAPHY ,WORLD Wide Web ,PILOT projects ,ELECTRONIC health records - Abstract
Background: Recent evidence suggests that screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer. However, optimal methods to identify potentially eligible patients in primary care are not known. Using brief electronic screening forms administered prior to a primary care visit is a strategy to identify high risk, asymptomatic patients eligible for LDCT screening. The objective of this study was to compare the acceptability and feasibility of using brief electronic versus paper screening forms to identify eligible patients at high risk of developing lung cancer in primary care. Methods: A mixed method pilot comparative study was conducted in primary care. Practices were allocated to an electronic form (e-form) group or a paper-based form (p-form) group. Allocation was randomly assigned for the first practice then by alternation. Patients in the e-form practices completed forms at home via the web or in the waiting room on a tablet. Patients in p-form practices completed forms in waiting rooms. Interviews were conducted with patients, administrators, and primary care physicians (PCPs) about their experiences. Results: Six of 30 (20%) eligible practices agreed to participate. Over the 16-week study period, a total of 831 of an expected 1442 patients (58%) aged 55-74 years were enrolled; 573/690 (83%) patients in the e-form group and 258/752 (34%) in the p-form group. Of the 573 participants in the e-form group, 335 (58%) completed forms via the web; 238 (29%) did so via tablet. Twenty-four interviews were conducted with 15 patients, 5 administrative staff and 4 PCPs. Patients were willing to discuss lung cancer screening eligibility with their PCP. Staff members expressed low administrative burden except for an extra step to link appointment information to patient demographics to identify eligible patients. PCPs indicated that forms were reminders to discuss smoking cessation. PCPs in the e-form group reported that patients asked questions about screening. Conclusion: There was fairly low uptake by primary care practices. For e-forms to be feasible in practice workflow, electronic medical record software needs to link appointment information with patient eligibility requirements. The use of brief pre-consultation electronic screening forms for LDCT eligibility encouraged PCPs to discuss smoking cessation with patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. An implementation history of primary health care transformation: Alberta’s primary care networks and the people, time and culture of change
- Author
-
Leslie, Myles, Khayatzadeh-Mahani, Akram, Birdsell, Judy, Forest, P. G., Henderson, Rita, Gray, Robin Patricia, Schraeder, Kyleigh, Seidel, Judy, Zwicker, Jennifer, and Green, Lee A.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. The relationship between having a regular general practitioner (GP) and the experience of healthcare barriers: a cross-sectional study among young people in NSW, Australia, with oversampling from marginalised groups
- Author
-
Kang, Melissa, Robards, Fiona, Luscombe, Georgina, Sanci, Lena, and Usherwood, Tim
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Determining factors in the retention of physicians in rural and underdeveloped areas: a systematic review
- Author
-
Mohammadiaghdam, Nasrin, Doshmangir, Leila, Babaie, Javad, Khabiri, Roghayeh, and Ponnet, Koen
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Predicting GP visits: A multinomial logistic regression investigating GP visits amongst a cohort of UK patients living with Myalgic encephalomyelitis
- Author
-
Walsh, R. Stephen, Denovan, Andrew, Drinkwater, Kenneth, Reddington, Sean, and Dagnall, Neil
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Examining Interprofessional teams structures and processes in the implementation of a primary care intervention (Health TAPESTRY) for older adults using normalization process theory
- Author
-
Valaitis, Ruta, Cleghorn, Laura, Dolovich, Lisa, Agarwal, Gina, Gaber, Jessica, Mangin, Derelie, Oliver, Doug, Parascandalo, Fiona, Ploeg, Jenny, and Risdon, Cathy
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Coordination of care for multimorbid patients from the perspective of general practitioners – a qualitative study
- Author
-
Stumm, Judith, Thierbach, Cornelia, Peter, Lisa, Schnitzer, Susanne, Dini, Lorena, Heintze, Christoph, and Döpfmer, Susanne
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. The Year of Care approach: developing a model and delivery programme for care and support planning in long term conditions within general practice
- Author
-
Roberts, Sue, Eaton, Simon, Finch, Tracy, Lewis-Barned, Nick, Lhussier, Monique, Oliver, Lindsay, Rapley, Tim, and Temple-Scott, Dawn
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care.
- Author
-
Cooke, Jo
- Subjects
RESEARCH ,MEDICAL care ,DECISION making ,HEALTH policy ,MEDICAL practice - Abstract
Background: Building research capacity in health services has been recognised internationally as important in order to produce a sound evidence base for decision making in policy and practice. Activities to increase research capacity for, within, and by practice include initiatives to support individuals and teams, organisations and networks. Little has been discussed or concluded about how to measure the effectiveness of research capacity building (RCB) Discussion: This article attempts to develop the debate on measuring RCB. It highlights that traditional outcomes of publications in peer reviewed journals and successful grant applications may be important outcomes to measure, but they may not address all the relevant issues to highlight progress, especially amongst novice researchers. They do not capture factors that contribute to developing an environment to support capacity development, or on measuring the usefulness or the 'social impact' of research, or on professional outcomes. The paper suggests a framework for planning change and measuring progress, based on six principles of RCB, which have been generated through the analysis of the literature, policy documents, empirical studies, and the experience of one Research and Development Support Unit in the UK. These principles are that RCB should: develop skills and confidence, support linkages and partnerships, ensure the research is 'close to practice', develop appropriate dissemination, invest in infrastructure, and build elements of sustainability and continuity. It is suggested that each principle operates at individual, team, organisation and supra organisational levels. Some criteria for measuring progress are also given. Summary: This paper highlights the need to identify ways of measuring RCB. It points out the limitations of current measurements that exist in the literature, and proposes a framework for measuring progress, which may form the basis of comparison of RCB activities. In this way it could contribute to establishing the effectiveness of these interventions, and establishing a knowledge base to inform the science of RCB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2005
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Patients' perception of safety climate in Irish general practice: a cross-sectional study.
- Author
-
Madden, Caoimhe, Lydon, Sinéad, Murphy, Andrew W., and O'Connor, Paul
- Subjects
FAMILY medicine ,CROSS-sectional method ,AGE distribution ,HEALTH outcome assessment ,REGRESSION analysis ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,QUALITY assurance ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,CONTENT analysis ,ETHNIC groups ,PATIENT safety - Abstract
Background: Although patients have the potential to provide important information on patient safety, considerably fewer patient-report measures of safety climate (SC) have been applied in the primary care setting as compared to secondary care. Our aim was to examine the application of a patient-report measure of safety climate in an Irish population to understand patient perceptions of safety in general practice and identify potential areas for improvement. Specifically, our research questions were: 1. What are patients' perceptions of SC in Irish general practice? 2. Do patient risk factors impact perceptions of SC? 3. Do patient responses to an open-ended question about safety enhance our understanding of patient safety beyond that obtained from a quantitative measure of SC? Methods: The Patient Perspective of Safety in General Practice (PPS-GP) survey was distributed to primary care patients in Ireland. The survey consisted of both Likert-response items, and free-text entry questions in relation to the safety of care. A series of five separate hierarchical regressions were used to examine the relationship between a range of patient-related variables and each of the survey subscales. A deductive content analysis approach was used to code the free-text responses. Results: A total of 584 completed online and paper surveys were received. Respondents generally had positive perceptions of safety across all five SC subscales of the PPS-GP. Regarding patient risk factors, younger age and being of non-Irish nationality were consistently associated with more negative SC perceptions. Analysis of the free-text responses revealed considerably poorer patient perceptions (n = 85, 65.4%) of the safety experience in primary care. Conclusion: Our findings indicate that despite being under-utilised, patients' perceptions are a valuable source of information for measuring SC, with promising implications for safety improvement in general practice. Further consideration should be given to how best to utilise this data in order to improve safety in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Optimising an intervention to support home-living older adults at risk of malnutrition: a qualitative study.
- Author
-
Payne, Liz, Ghio, Daniela, Grey, Elisabeth, Slodkowska-Barabasz, Joanna, Harris, Philine, Sutcliffe, Michelle, Green, Sue, Roberts, Helen C., Childs, Caroline, Robinson, Sian, Gudgin, Bernard, Holloway, Pam, Kelly, Jo, Wallis, Kathy, Dean, Oliver, Aveyard, Paul, Gill, Paramjit, Stroud, Mike, Little, Paul, and Yardley, Lucy
- Subjects
FOOD habits ,RESEARCH methodology ,FAMILY medicine ,INTERVIEWING ,MEDICAL care use ,DIETARY supplements ,QUALITATIVE research ,PRIMARY health care ,MALNUTRITION ,INDEPENDENT living ,QUALITY of life ,AGING ,THEMATIC analysis ,DISEASE risk factors ,OLD age - Abstract
Background: In the UK, about 14% of community-dwelling adults aged 65 and over are estimated to be at risk of malnutrition. Screening older adults in primary care and treating those at risk may help to reduce malnutrition risk, reduce the resulting need for healthcare use and improve quality of life. Interventions are needed to raise older adults' risk awareness, offer relevant and meaningful strategies to address risk and support general practices to deliver treatment and support. Methods: Using the Person-based Approach and input from Patient and Public Involvement representatives, we developed the 'Eat well, feel well, stay well' intervention. The intervention was optimised using qualitative data from think aloud and semi-structured process evaluation interviews with 23 and 18 older adults respectively. Positive and negative comments were extracted to inform rapid iterative modifications to support engagement with the intervention. Data were then analysed thematically and final adjustments made, to optimise the meaningfulness of the intervention for the target population. Results: Participants' comments were generally positive. This paper focuses predominantly on participants' negative reactions, to illustrate the changes needed to ensure that intervention materials were optimally relevant and meaningful to older adults. Key factors that undermined engagement included: resistance to the recommended nutritional intake among those with reduced appetite or eating difficulties, particularly frequent eating and high energy options; reluctance to gain weight; and a perception that advice did not align with participants' specific personal preferences and eating difficulties. We addressed these issues by adjusting the communication of eating goals to be more closely aligned with older adults' beliefs about good nutrition, and acceptable and feasible eating patterns. We also adjusted the suggested tips and strategies to fit better with older adults' everyday activities, values and beliefs. Conclusions: Using iterative qualitative methods facilitated the identification of key behavioural and contextual elements that supported engagement, and issues that undermined older adults' engagement with intervention content. This informed crucial revisions to the intervention content that enabled us to maximise the meaningfulness, relevance and feasibility of the key messages and suggested strategies to address malnutrition risk, and therefore optimise engagement with the intervention and the behavioural advice it provided. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Factors influencing the implementation of chronic care models: A systematic literature review.
- Author
-
Davy, Carol, Bleasel, Jonathan, Hueiming Liu, Tchan, Maria, Ponniah, Sharon, and Brown, Alex
- Subjects
CHRONIC disease treatment ,CINAHL database ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems ,MATHEMATICAL models ,MEDICAL care ,MEDLINE ,PATIENTS ,RESEARCH funding ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,THEORY - Abstract
Background: The increasing prevalence of chronic disease faced by both developed and developing countries is of considerable concern to a number of international organisations. Many of the interventions to address this concern within primary healthcare settings are based on the chronic care model (CCM). The implementation of complex interventions such as CCMs requires careful consideration and planning. Success depends on a number of factors at the healthcare provider, team, organisation and system levels. Methods: The aim of this systematic review was to systematically examine the scientific literature in order to understand the facilitators and barriers to implementing CCMs within a primary healthcare setting. This review focused on both quantitative and qualitative studies which included patients with chronic disease (cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic respiratory disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, depression and HIV/AIDS) receiving care in primary healthcare settings, as well as primary healthcare providers such as doctors, nurses and administrators. Papers were limited to those published in English between 1998 and 2013. Results: The search returned 3492 articles. The majority of these studies were subsequently excluded based on their title or abstract because they clearly did not meet the inclusion criteria for this review. A total of 226 full text articles were obtained and a further 188 were excluded as they did not meet the criteria. Thirty eight published peer-reviewed articles were ultimately included in this review. Five primary themes emerged. In addition to ensuring appropriate resources to support implementation and sustainability, the acceptability of the intervention for both patients and healthcare providers contributed to the success of the intervention. There was also a need to prepare healthcare providers for the implementation of a CCM, and to support patients as the way in which they receive care changes. Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrated the importance of considering human factors including the influence that different stakeholders have on the success or otherwise of the implementing a CCM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview is useful and well accepted as part of the clinical assessment for depression and anxiety in primary care: a mixed-methods study.
- Author
-
Pettersson, Agneta, Modin, Sonja, Wahlström, Rolf, af Winklerfelt Hammarberg, Sandra, and Krakau, Ingvar
- Subjects
ANXIETY diagnosis ,DIAGNOSIS of mental depression ,DIAGNOSTIC errors ,INTERVIEWING ,NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL tests ,PATIENT satisfaction ,GENERAL practitioners ,PRIMARY health care ,QUALITATIVE research ,QUANTITATIVE research ,PSYCHIATRIC treatment ,DATA analysis software - Abstract
Background: Psychiatric complaints are common among primary care patients, with depression and anxiety being the most frequent. Diagnosis of anxiety and depression can be difficult, potentially leading to over- as well as under-diagnosis. The diagnostic process can be facilitated by incorporating structured interviews as part of the assessment. One such instrument, the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), has been established and accepted in psychiatric care. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences and perceptions of the paper-and-pen version of MINI version 6.0 among patients and staff in primary care centers in Sweden. Methods: The MINI was introduced at three primary care centers and was conducted by either therapists or general practitioners. Patients presented with symptoms that could suggest depression or anxiety disorders. The duration of the interview was recorded. The experiences and perceptions of 125 patients and their interviewers were collected using a structured questionnaire. Global satisfaction was measured with a visual-analog scale (0-100). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 patients and three therapists, and focus groups were held with 17 general practitioners. Qualitative content analysis was used for the interviews and focus groups. The findings across the groups were triangulated with results from the questionnaires. Results: The median global satisfaction with the MINI was 80 for patients and 86 for interviewers. General practitioners appreciated that the MINI identified comorbidities, as one-third of the patients had at least two psychiatric diagnoses. The MINI helped general practitioners attain a more accurate diagnosis. Patients appreciated that the MINI helped them recognize and verbalize their problems and did not find it intrusive. Patients and interviewers had mixed experiences with the yes-no format of the MINI, and the risk of subjective interpretations was acknowledged. Patients, general practitioners and therapists stated that the MINI contributed to appropriate treatment. The MINI assessment lasted 26 min on average (range 12 to 60 min). Conclusions: The paper-and-pen version of the MINI could be useful in primary care as part of the clinical assessment of patients with problems suggestive of depression or anxiety disorders. The MINI was well accepted by patients, general practitioners and therapists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Management of COVID-19 ICU-survivors in primary care: - a narrative review.
- Author
-
Schmidt, KFR, Gensichen, J., Gehrke-Beck, S., Kosilek, R. P., Kühne, F., Heintze, C, Baldwin, L. M., and Needham, D. M.
- Subjects
PATIENT aftercare ,COVID-19 ,CRITICALLY ill ,PATIENTS ,MENTAL health ,COGNITION ,PRIMARY health care ,DISEASE management - Abstract
Many survivors of critical illness suffer from long-lasting physical, cognitive, and mental health sequelae. The number of affected patients is expected to markedly increase due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Many ICU survivors receive long-term care from a primary care physician. Hence, awareness and appropriate management of these sequelae is crucial. An interdisciplinary authorship team participated in a narrative literature review to identify key issues in managing COVID-19 ICU-survivors in primary care. The aim of this perspective paper is to synthesize important literature to understand and manage sequelae of critical illness due to COVID-19 in the primary care setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Organizational attributes of interprofessional primary care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in ontario, Canada: a multiple case study.
- Author
-
Bobbette, Nicole, Lysaght, Rosemary, Ouellette-Kuntz, Hélène, Tranmer, Joan, and Donnelly, Catherine
- Subjects
EVALUATION of medical care ,ACQUISITION of data methodology ,RESEARCH methodology ,DEVELOPMENTAL disabilities ,INTERVIEWING ,PRIMARY health care ,QUALITATIVE research ,HEALTH care teams ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,CASE studies ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,MEDICAL records ,PEOPLE with intellectual disabilities ,CONTENT analysis ,THEMATIC analysis ,CORPORATE culture - Abstract
Background: Access to high-quality primary care has been identified as a pressing need for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). Adults with IDD live with complex physical and mental health conditions, use health services differently than the general population and continue to face challenges when accessing health services. Interprofessional primary care teams offer comprehensive and coordinated approaches to primary care delivery and are well-positioned to address the needs of adults with IDD and other vulnerable populations. Although interprofessional primary care teams are recommended, there is currently limited understanding of how interprofessional care is delivered and how access to a team of providers improves the health of this population. The aim of this paper is to describe the organizational attributes of interprofessional primary care for adults with IDD within and across models of team-based care in one local health service context. Methods: A multiple case study was conducted with five interprofessional primary care teams in Ontario, Canada. Multiple methods were used to generate data including: a survey, document review, electronic medical record report and qualitative interviews. Pattern matching was the primary analytic approach for the within and across case analysis. Results: Adults with IDD were found to be a small part of the patient population served and this group was poorly identified in three of five teams. Key organizational attributes that support the delivery of interprofessional primary care for adults with IDD were identified. Two examples of targeted programs of care for this group were also found. Despite the presence of interprofessional health providers in all teams, there were limited organizational processes to engage a wide-range of interprofessional services in the care of this group. There was no consistent reporting of outcomes or processes in place to measure the impact of interprofessional services for this population. Conclusions: This study provides important insights into the current state of interprofessional primary care for adults with IDD in Ontario and highlight a critical need for further work in the field to develop organizational structures and processes to engage in team-based care and demonstrate the value of the approach for this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Making sense of symptoms, clinicians and systems: a qualitative evaluation of a facilitated support group for patients with medically unexplained symptoms.
- Author
-
Marcinow, Michelle, Sandercock, Jane, D'Silva, Chelsea, Daien, David, Ellis, Carly, Dias, Christine, and Mansfield, Elizabeth
- Subjects
AFFINITY groups ,PILOT projects ,SOCIAL support ,RESEARCH methodology ,SELF-management (Psychology) ,INTERVIEWING ,PATIENTS' attitudes ,QUALITATIVE research ,HUMAN services programs ,SUPPORT groups ,MEDICALLY unexplained symptoms ,INFORMATION resources ,COMMUNICATION ,PATIENT-professional relations ,THEMATIC analysis ,PSYCHOLOGICAL adaptation ,MEDICAL needs assessment - Abstract
Objectives: Health services to date have inadequately addressed the physical and mental health needs of patients with medically unexplained symptoms. This qualitative study evaluates a piloted facilitated support group (FSG) developed for patients with medically unexplained symptoms to inform recommendations and resources for this patient population. Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted and thematically analyzed semi-structured interviews with participants (n = 8) and facilitators (n = 4) to explore their experiences of the facilitated support group. Common themes that captured strengths and challenges of the facilitated support group were identified. Results: The following key themes were identified through analysis of the data: Participants described 1) feeling validated through sharing similar experiences with peers; 2) learning practical symptom management and coping strategies; and 3) gaining new perspectives for navigating conversations with PCPs. Conclusions: Our findings show that a facilitated support group may provide additional forms of support and resources for patients with medically unexplained symptoms, filling a gap in currently available clinical care offered by health care professionals. Potential implications: This paper highlights lessons learned that can inform the design and delivery of future supports and resources directed toward optimizing patient care for this underserved patient population. Our findings are relevant to those who are involved in direct patient care or involved in designing and implementing self-management programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Determinants for use of direct-to-consumer telemedicine consultations in primary healthcare—a registry based total population study from Stockholm, Sweden.
- Author
-
Dahlgren, Cecilia, Dackehag, Margareta, Wändell, Per, and Rehnberg, Clas
- Subjects
MEDICAL consultation ,AGE distribution ,SOCIOECONOMIC factors ,MEDICAL care use ,PRIMARY health care ,INCOME ,PUBLIC hospitals ,NURSES ,LOGISTIC regression analysis ,TELEMEDICINE ,PROBABILITY theory ,EDUCATIONAL attainment - Abstract
Background: In recent years, telemedicine consultations have evolved as a new form of providing primary healthcare. Telemedicine options can provide benefits to patients in terms of access, reduced travel time and no risk of disease spreading. However, concerns have been raised that access is not equally distributed in the population, which could lead to increased inequality in health. The aim of this paper is to explore the determinants for use of direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine consultations in a setting where telemedicine is included in the publicly funded healthcare system. Methods: To investigate factors associated with the use of DTC telemedicine, a database was constructed by linking national and regional registries covering the entire population of Stockholm, Sweden (N = 2.3 million). Logistic regressions were applied to explore the determinants for utilization in 2018. As comparators, face-to-face physician consultations in primary healthcare were included in the study, as well as digi-physical physician consultations, i.e., telemedicine consultations offered by traditional primary healthcare providers also offering face-to-face visits, and telephone consultations by nurses. Results: The determinants for use of DTC telemedicine differed substantially from face-to-face visits but also to some extent from the other telemedicine options. For the DTC telemedicine consultations, the factors associated with higher probability of utilization were younger age, higher educational attainment, higher income and being born in Sweden. In contrast, the main determinants for use of face-to-face visits were higher age, lower educational background and being born outside of Sweden. Conclusion: The use of DTC telemedicine is determined by factors that are generally not associated with greater healthcare need and the distribution raises some concerns about the equity implications. Policy makers aiming to increase the level of telemedicine consultations in healthcare should consider measures to promote access for elderly and individuals born outside of Sweden to ensure that all groups have access to healthcare services according to their needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Clinical laboratory services for primary healthcare centers in urban cities: a pilot ACO model of ten primary healthcare centers.
- Author
-
Tashkandi, Soha A., Alenezi, Ali, Bakhsh, Ismail, AlJuryyan, Abdullah, AlShehry, Zahir H, AlRashdi, Saeed, Guzman, Maryjane, Pono, Marvin, Lim, Franklin, Tabudlong, April Rose, Elwan, Lamees, Fagih, Musa, and Aboabat, Ahmad
- Subjects
PRIMARY health care ,HOSPITAL laboratories ,ACCOUNTABLE care organizations ,QUALITY assurance ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,METROPOLITAN areas ,STATISTICAL models ,REHABILITATION ,PALLIATIVE treatment - Abstract
Background: Primary healthcare centers (PHC) ensure that patients receive comprehensive care from promotion and prevention to treatment, rehabilitation, and palliative care in a familiar environment. It is designed to provide first-contact, continuous, comprehensive, and coordinated patient care that will help achieve equity in the specialty healthcare system. The healthcare in Saudi Arabia is undergoing transformation to Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) model. In order for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) to achieve its transformational goals in healthcare, the improvement of PHCs' quality and utilization is crucial. An integral part of this service is the laboratory services. Methods: This paper presents a pilot model for the laboratory services of PHC's in urban cities. The method was based on the FOCUS-PDCA quality improvement method focusing on the pre-analytical phase of the laboratory testing as well as the Saudi Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutes (CBAHI) gap analysis and readiness within the ten piloted primary healthcare centers. Results: The Gap analysis, revealed in-consistency in the practice, lead to lower the quality of the service, which was seen in the low performance of the chosen key performance indicators (KPI's) (high rejection rates, lower turn-around times (TAT) for test results) and also in the competency of the staff. Following executing the interventions, and by using some of the ACO Laboratory strategies; the KPI rates were improved, and our results exceeded the targets that we have set to reach during the first year. Also introducing the electronic connectivity improved the TAT KPI and made many of the processes leaner. Conclusions: Our results revealed that the centralization of PHC's laboratory service to an accredited reference laboratory and implementing the national accreditation standards improved the testing process and lowered the cost, for the mass majority of the routine laboratory testing. Moreover, the model shed the light on how crucial the pre-analytical phase for laboratory quality improvement process, its effect on cost reduction, and the importance of staff competency and utilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Frequent attenders in late life in primary care: a systematic review of European studies.
- Author
-
Welze, Franziska D., Stein, Janine, Hajek, André, König, Hans-Helmut, and Riedel-Heller, Steffi G.
- Subjects
EXPERIMENTAL design ,MEDICAL databases ,INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems ,PSYCHOLOGY information storage & retrieval systems ,MEDLINE ,MENTAL illness ,ONLINE information services ,PRIMARY health care ,QUALITY assurance ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,SEVERITY of illness index ,OLD age - Abstract
Background: High utilization of health care services is a costly phenomenon commonly observed in primary care practices. However, while frequent attendance in primary care has been broadly studied across age groups, aspects of high utilization by elderly patients have not been investigated in detail. The aim of this paper is to provide a systematic review of frequent attendance in primary care among elderly people. Methods: We searched five databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubPsych, and Cochrane Library) for published papers addressing frequent attendance in primary health care among elderly individuals. Quality of studies was assessed using established criteria for evaluating methodological quality. Results: Ten studies met inclusion criteria and were included for detailed analysis. The average number of patients frequently utilizing primary care services varied across studies from 10% to 33% of the elderly samples and subsamples. The definition of frequent attendance across studies differed substantially. The most consistent associations between frequent attendance and old age were found for presence and severity of physical illness. Results on mental disorders and frequent attendance were heterogeneous. Only a few studies have assessed frequent attendance in association with factors such as drug use, social support or sociodemographic aspects; however results were inconsistent. Conclusions: Severe ill health and the need for treatment serve as the main drivers of frequent attendance in older adults. As results were scarce and divergent, future studies are needed to provide more information on this topic. Since prior studies have offered only a snapshot of this service use behaviour, a longitudinal approach would be preferable in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
31. Shared medical appointments and patient-centered experience: a mixed-methods systematic review
- Author
-
Wadsworth, Kim H., Archibald, Trevor G., Payne, Allison E., Cleary, Anita K., Haney, Byron L., and Hoverman, Adam S.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
32. Affecting patients with work-related problems by educational training of their GPs: a cost-effectiveness study
- Author
-
de Kock, Cornelis, Noben, Cindy, Lagro-Janssen, Antoine, Lucassen, Peter, Knottnerus, André, de Rijk, Angelique, Nijhuis, Frans, Steenbeek, Romy, and Evers, Silvia
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
33. Physical activity assessment in practice: a mixed methods study of GPPAQ use in primary care.
- Author
-
Heron, Neil, Tully, Mark A., McKinley, Michelle C., and Cupples, Margaret E.
- Subjects
PRIMARY health care ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,PHYSICAL activity ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background Insufficient physical activity (PA) levels which increase the risk of chronic disease are reported by almost two-thirds of the population. More evidence is needed about how PA promotion can be effectively implemented in general practice (GP), particularly in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. One tool recommended for the assessment of PA in GP and supported by NICE (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence) is The General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) but details of how it may be used and of its acceptability to practitioners and patients are limited. This study aims to examine aspects of GPPAQ administration in non-urgent patient contacts using different primary care electronic recording systems and to explore the views of health professionals regarding its use. Methods Four general practices, selected because of their location within socio-economically disadvantaged areas, were invited to administer GPPAQs to patients, aged 35-75 years, attending non-urgent consultations, over two-week periods. They used different methods of administration and different electronic medical record systems (EMIS, Premiere, Vision). Participants' (general practitioners (GPs), nurses and receptionists) views regarding GPPAQ use were explored via questionnaires and focus groups. Results Of 2,154 eligible consultations, 192(8.9%) completed GPPAQs; of these 83(43%) were categorised as inactive. All practices were located within areas ranked as being in the tertile of greatest socio-economic deprivation in Northern Ireland. GPs/nurses in two practices invited completion of the GPPAQ, receptionists did so in two. One practice used an electronic template; three used paper copies of the questionnaires. End-of-study questionnaires, completed by 11 GPs, 3 nurses and 2 receptionists and two focus groups, with GPs (n = 8) and nurses (n = 4) indicated that practitioners considered the GPPAQ easy to use but not in every consultation. Its use extended consultation time, particularly for patients with complex problems who could potentially benefit from PA promotion. Conclusions GPs and nurses reported that the GPPAQ itself was an easy tool with which to assess PA levels in general practice and feasible to use in a range of electronic record systems but integration within routine practice is constrained by time and complex consultations. Further exploration of ways to facilitate PA promotion into practice is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
34. Burnout and health status differences among primary healthcare professionals in Portugal.
- Author
-
Ferreira, Pedro L., Raposo, Vitor, Tavares, Aida Isabel, and Pinto, Ana
- Subjects
PSYCHOLOGICAL burnout ,WELL-being ,INTERNET ,SELF-evaluation ,HEALTH status indicators ,POPULATION geography ,PRIMARY health care ,HOSPITAL nursing staff ,QUESTIONNAIRES - Abstract
Background: This paper is focused on two indicators which may be considered as proxies of individuals' well-being: self-assessed health and burnout intensity. There is little research relating these concepts with the type of the primary healthcare setting, its urbanization density and the region. The aims of this work are threefold: (i) to find determinant factors of individual health status and burnout, (ii) to find possible differences across different types of health care units, differently urbanized areas, and different administrative regions, and (iii) to verify if there are differences in between GPs and nurses. Methods: Data was gathered from an online questionnaire implemented on primary health care. A sample of 9,094 professionals from all 1,212 primary health care settings in Portugal mainland was obtained from an online questionnaire filled from January and April 2018. Statistical analyses include the estimation of two ordered probits, one explaining self-assessed health and the other the burnout. Results: The individual drivers for good health and lower levels of burnout, that is, better well-being, are estimated for GPs and nurses. Main findings support that, first, nurses report worst health than GPs, but the latter tend to suffer higher levels of burnout, and also that, 'place' effects arising from the health unit settings and regional location are more significant in GPs than in nurses. However, urbanization density is not significantly associated with health or burnout. Conclusions: A set of policy recommendations are suggested to improve the healthcare workforce well-being, such as improving job satisfaction and income. These policies should be taken at the health care unit level and at the regional administrative level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
35. Managing COVID-19 related distress in primary care: principles of assessment and management.
- Author
-
Wright, Laurence Astill, Gnanapragasam, Sam, Downes, Anthony J., and Bisson, Jonathan I.
- Abstract
COVID-19 will cause normal feelings of worry and stress and many of those who experience higher levels of distress will experience resolution of their symptoms as society returns to pre-COVID-19 functioning. Only a minority are likely to develop a psychiatric disorder. Certain individuals may be vulnerable to experiencing persisting symptoms, such as those with pre-existing comorbidity. Management approaches could centre around using collaborative approaches to provide and build on already existing socioeconomic support structures, the avoidance of over-medicalisation, watchful waiting and finally treating those who do meet the criteria for psychiatric diagnosis. Primary care clinicians are likely be the first healthcare point of contact for most COVID-19 related distress and it is important that they are able to provide evidence based and evidence informed responses, which includes social, psychological and pharmacological approaches. This expert opinion paper serves to summarise some approaches, based primarily on indirect extrapolation of evidence concerning the general management of psychological distress, in the absence of COVID-19 specific evidence, to assist primary care clinicians in their assessment and management of COVID-19 related distress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
36. Healthcare professional-led interventions on lifestyle modifications for hypertensive patients – a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Treciokiene, Indre, Postma, Maarten, Nguyen, Thang, Fens, Tanja, Petkevicius, Jurgis, Kubilius, Raimondas, Gulbinovic, Jolanta, and Taxis, Katja
- Subjects
HYPERTENSION ,ONLINE information services ,CINAHL database ,META-analysis ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,HEALTH behavior ,PATIENT-professional relations ,MEDLINE ,BEHAVIOR modification - Abstract
Background: About 0.9 billion people in the world have hypertension. The mortality due to hypertension increased dramatically over the last decades. Healthcare professionals should support patients with hypertension to modify their lifestyle to decrease blood pressure, but an overview of effective lifestyle interventions is lacking. The aim of this study was to determine whether healthcare professional-led interventions on lifestyle modifications are effective in lowering blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Methods: A systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) of interventions on lifestyle modifications of hypertensive patients which were performed by healthcare professionals (physician, nurse, pharmacist) and which reported blood pressure measurements. Papers were reviewed by two reviewers and analysed using Cochrane software Revman 5.4. In a meta-analysis difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and the percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure (BP) was analysed. Results: In total, 34 clinical trials reporting on 22,419 patients (mean age 58.4 years, 49.14% female, 69.9% used antihypertensive medications) were included. The mean difference SBP was − 4.41 mmHg (95% CI, − 5.52to − 3.30) and the mean difference DBP was − 1.66 mmHg (95% CI − 2.44 to − 0.88) in favor of the intervention group vs usual care. Fifty-six percent of patients achieved BP control in the intervention group vs 44% in usual care, OR = 1.87 (95% CI, 1.51 to 2.31). Conclusion: Healthcare professional-led interventions were effective. Patients achieved almost 5 mmHg decrease of SBP and more patients achieved BP control. The results suggest that efforts are needed for widespread implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
37. Mindfulness in primary care healthcare and teaching professionals and its relationship with stress at work: a multicentric cross-sectional study.
- Author
-
Magallón-Botaya, Rosa, Pérula-de Torres, Luis Angel, Verdes-Montenegro Atalaya, Juan Carlos, Pérula-Jiménez, Celia, Lietor-Villajos, Norberto, Bartolomé-Moreno, Cruz, Garcia-Campayo, Javier, Moreno-Martos, Herminia, the Minduudd Collaborative Study Group, Rodriguez, Luis Alberto, Roldán-Villalobos, Ana, Melús-Palazón, Elena, Valverde, Francisco Javier, Hachem-Salas, Nur, García-De Vinuesa, Leonor, Morillo, Carmen, Grande, Teresa, Epstein, Ronald, Borau, Luis, and Arias-Vega, Raquel
- Subjects
COLLEGE teachers ,HOSPITAL medical staff ,JOB stress ,MEDICAL cooperation ,MULTIVARIATE analysis ,NURSES ,PRIMARY health care ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESEARCH ,STATISTICS ,CROSS-sectional method ,MINDFULNESS ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,INFERENTIAL statistics - Abstract
Background: Work stress is a common problem among the health personnel of the Spanish National Health System. The objective of this paper is to assess the state of mindfulness among Spanish primary care providers and to evaluate its potential relationship with work stress and basic labor and sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: Cross-sectional, multi-centric study. Primary care nurses, teachers, teaching collaborators and residents assigned to six Spanish Family Medicine/Family and Community Care Departments were invited to participate (n = 475). A template was designed in Google Forms, including sociodemographic and work-related variables. The state of mindfulness was measured with the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), while work-related stress was measured using an ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 10 points. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were carried out, as well as bivariate and multivariate statistics. Results: The mean age of participants was 40,14 ± 13.12 (range:23–65 years); 66.9% were women, 42.5% internal medicine residents, 29.3% family physicians, and 20.2% nurses. More than half (54.5%) knew about mindfulness, with 24.0% have received training on it, and 22.5% were usual practitioners. The average level of mindfulness was 127.18 ± 15.45 (range: 89–177). The average score of stress at work was 6.00 ± 2.44; 49.9% (range: 0–10). 49.9% of participants scored 7 or more on the stress at work scale. There was an inverse correlation between the levels of mindfulness (FFMQ total score) and work-related stress (Spearman's r = − 0.155, p = 0.003). Significant relationships between the mindfulness practice and the level of mindfulness (F = 29.80, p < 0.001), as well as between the mindfulness practice and the level of work-related stress (F = 9.68, p = 0.042), were also found. Conclusions: Levels of mindfulness in primary care health providers were in line with those levels observed in other groups of health professionals. Half of all of the primary care providers suffered from a high degree of stress. Although weak, inverse relationships were observed between levels of mindfulness and stress at work, with lower values of stress at work among those who practiced mindfulness. Trial registration: NCT03629457. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
38. Swāsthya, an integrated chronic condition management programme for families of patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
- Author
-
Saju, M D, Varghese, Bindiya M, Scaria, Lorane, Benny, Anuja Maria, Yohannan, Shilpa V, Cheguvera, Natania, Rajeev, S P, and Jotheeswaran, Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan
- Subjects
CHRONIC disease risk factors ,FAMILIES ,FAMILY health ,FAMILY services ,HYPERTENSION ,INTEGRATED health care delivery ,RISK assessment ,DISEASE management ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,EVALUATION of human services programs - Abstract
Background: Kerala is known as the diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN) capital of the world, thus compelling health professionals to model strategies, addressing their social, behavioural, and cognitive risk factors and eliminating various barriers to management. This paper describes the protocol of our study that aims to examine the effectiveness and sustainability of an integrated care model for the management of chronic conditions and their risk factors through a family-based intervention. The proposed care model targets to modify systems and processes that predispose to chronic conditions by enhancing social cohesion and social networks, preventing lifestyle risks, developing iterative cognitive interventions, and engaging the family into customised treatment adherence strategies navigated by community health social workers (CHSWs). Methods: A cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) in selected participants will be conducted involving additional assessments prior to the baseline assessment. The assessment will identify and categorise patients into four risk groups, namely behavioural, social, cognitive, and multiple, based on dominant risks identified. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated (at a ratio of 1:1) into the intervention or control arm. The intervention arm will receive social, behavioural, and cognitive or multiple interventions corresponding to the identified risk groups, whereas the control arm will receive general intervention. Both the groups will be followed up at 6 months and 12 months post baseline to measure outcomes. The primary outcome will be the control of HTN and DM, and secondary outcomes include decreased depression and anxiety and improved functioning, social cohesion, and social network linkages. The sustainability and scalability of this intervention will be assessed through cost effectiveness, acceptability, and user friendliness of the integrated approach by performing a qualitative evaluation. Discussion: This RCT will inform the potential paradigm shift from a medical model of chronic condition management to a multidimensional, multisystem, and multidisciplinary convergence model navigated by CHSWs. Such a model is not currently considered in the management of chronic conditions in Kerala. Trial registration: Trial has been prospectively registered on Clinical Trial Registry of India- CTRI/2020/12/029474 on 1st December 2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
39. Barriers to the use of trained interpreters in consultations with refugees in four resettlement countries: a qualitative analysis using normalisation process theory.
- Author
-
MacFarlane, Anne, Huschke, Susann, Pottie, Kevin, Hauck, Fern R., Griswold, Kim, and Harris, Mark F.
- Subjects
COMMUNICATION ,MEDICAL referrals ,PRIMARY health care ,REFUGEES ,SURVEYS ,QUALITATIVE research ,HEALTH facility translating services ,THEMATIC analysis ,CROSS-sectional method - Abstract
Background: Increasing numbers of primary care practitioners in refugee resettlement countries are providing care to refugees. Access to trained interpreters is a priority for these practitioners, but there are many barriers to the implementation of interpreted consultations in routine care. There is a lack of international, theoretically informed research. The purpose of this paper is to understand barriers to interpreter use in primary care consultations in four resettlement countries using Normalisation Process Theory. Method: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey with networks of primary care practitioners (PCPs) who care for refugees in Australia, Canada, Ireland and the US (n = 314). We analysed qualitative data from the survey about barriers to interpreter use (n = 178). We completed an inductive thematic analysis, iteratively developed a Normalisation Process Theory (NPT)-informed coding frame and then mapped the emergent findings onto the theory's construct about enacting interpreted consultations. Results: In all four countries, the use of an interpreter presented communication and interaction challenges between providers and patients, which can impede the goals of primary care consultations. Primary care practitioners did not always have confidence in interpreted consultations and described poor professional practice by some interpreters. There was variation across countries, and inconsistency within countries, in the availability of trained interpreters and funding sources. Conclusion: There are shared and differential barriers to implementation of interpreted consultations in a consistent and sustained way in the four countries studied. These findings can be used to inform country-specific and international level policies and interventions focusing on improving skills and resources for interpreted consultations to improve implementation of interpreted primary care consultations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
40. The clinically excellent primary care physician: examples from the published literature.
- Author
-
Lee, Kimberley, Wright, Scott M., and Wolfe, Leah
- Subjects
CLINICAL competence ,COMMUNICATIVE competence ,CRITICAL thinking ,HUMANISM ,INTELLECT ,MEDICAL quality control ,NEGOTIATION ,PHYSICIAN-patient relations ,GENERAL practitioners ,PRIMARY health care ,PROFESSIONAL employee training ,PROFESSIONALISM - Abstract
Clinical excellence is the ultimate goal in patient care. Exactly what the clinically excellent primary care physician (PCP) looks like and her characteristics have not been explicitly described. This manuscript serves to illustrate clinical excellence in primary care, using primarily case reports exemplifying physicians delivering holistic and patient-centred care to their patients. With an ever in creasing demand for accessible and accountable health care, an understanding of the qualities desirable in primary care providers is now especially relevant. A literature review was conducted to identify compelling stories showing how excellent PCPs care for their patients. In the 2397 published works reviewed, we were able to find case reports and studies that exemplified every domain of the description of clinical excellence proposed and published by the Miller Coulson Academy of Clinical Excellence (MCACE). After reviewing these reports, the authors felt that the domains of excellence, as described by the MCACE, are practically applicable and relevant for primary care physicians. It is our hope that this paper prompts readers to reflect on clinical excellence in primary care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
41. Relations between task delegation and job satisfaction in general practice: a systematic literature review.
- Author
-
Riisgaard, Helle, Nexøe, Jørgen, Le, Jette V., Søndergaard, Jens, and Ledderer, Loni
- Subjects
CINAHL database ,MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems ,JOB satisfaction ,MEDLINE ,ONLINE information services ,QUALITY assurance ,RESEARCH funding ,SYSTEMATIC reviews ,TASK performance - Abstract
Background: It has for years been discussed whether practice staff should be involved in patient care in general practice to a higher extent. The research concerning task delegation within general practice is generally increasing, but the literature focusing on its influence on general practitioners' and their staff's job satisfaction appears to be sparse even though job satisfaction is acknowledged as an important factor associated with both patient satisfaction and medical quality of care. Therefore, the overall aim of this study was 1) to review the current research on the relation between task delegation and general practitioners' and their staff's job satisfaction and, additionally, 2) to review the evidence of possible explanations for this relation. Methods: A systematic literature review. We searched the four databases PubMed, Cinahl, Embase, and Scopus systematically. The immediate relevance of the retrieved articles was evaluated by title and abstract by the first author, and papers that seemed to meet the aim of the review were then fully read by first author and last author independently judging the eligibility of content. Results: We included four studies in the review. They explored views and attitudes of the staff, encompassing nurses as well as practice managers. Only one of the included studies also explored general practitioners' views and attitudes, hence making it impossible to establish any syntheses on this relation. According to the studies, the staff's overall attitude towards task delegation was positive and led to increased job satisfaction, probably because task delegation comprised a high degree of work autonomy. Conclusions: The few studies included in our review suggest that task delegation within general practice may be seen by the staff as an overall positive issue contributing to their job satisfaction, primarily due to perceived autonomy in the work. However, because of the small sample size comprising only qualitative studies, and due to the heterogeneity of these studies, we cannot draw unambiguous conclusions although we point towards tendencies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
42. Lesbian womens' access to healthcare, experiences with and expectations towards GPs in German primary care.
- Author
-
Hirsch, Oliver, Löltgen, Karina, and Becker, Annette
- Subjects
DEMOGRAPHY ,MENTAL depression ,DISCRIMINATION (Sociology) ,HEALTH services accessibility ,LESBIANS ,PATIENT satisfaction ,PRIMARY health care ,PSYCHOLOGICAL tests ,QUALITY assurance ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,RESEARCH evaluation ,SELF-disclosure ,STATISTICS ,SURVEYS ,LOGISTIC regression analysis ,DATA analysis ,HUMAN research subjects ,PATIENT selection ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Background: Lesbian women have higher rates of physical and psychiatric disorders associated with experiences of discrimination, homophobia and difficulties with coming out. Therefore, easy access to specialized healthcare in an open atmosphere is needed. We aimed to describe women's access to and experiences with healthcare in Germany, and to assess the responsibility of the general practitioner (GP) compared to other specialities providing primary health care. Methods: A questionnaire study was conducted via internet and paper-based sampling. Using current literature, we designed a questionnaire consisting of sociodemographic data, sexual orientation, access to care and reasons for encounter, disclosure of sexual orientation, experience with the German health system (discrimination, homophobia), and psychological burden. Depression was assessed using the depression screening from the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2). Results: We obtained responses from 766 lesbian women. Although 89% had a primary care physician, only 40% had revealed their sexual orientation to their doctor. The main medical contacts were GPs (66%), gynaecologists (10%) or psychiatrists (6%). Twenty-three percent claimed they were unable to find a primary care physician. Another 12.4% had experienced discrimination. Younger lesbian women with higher education levels and who were less likely to be out to other physicians were more likely to disclose their sexual orientation to their primary care physician. GPs play an important role in healthcare for lesbian women, even in a non-gatekeeping healthcare system like Germany. Study participants suggested improvements regarding gender neutral language, flyers on homosexuality in waiting areas, involvement of partners, training of physicians, directories of homosexual physicians and labelling as a lesbian-friendly practice. Conclusions: GPs should create an open atmosphere and acquire the respective knowledge to provide adequate treatment. Caring for marginal groups should be incorporated in medical training and further education. Ideally, physicians address patients' sexual orientation pro-actively in order to address individual needs accordingly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
43. Health risk appraisal in older people 6: factors associated with self-reported poor vision and uptake of eye tests in older people.
- Author
-
Iliffe, Steve, Kharicha, Kalpa, Harari, Danielle, Swift, Cameron, Gillmann, Gerhard, and Stuck, Andreas E.
- Subjects
VISION disorders ,MEDICAL screening ,CHI-squared test ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,EPIDEMIOLOGY ,RESEARCH funding ,SELF-evaluation ,LOGISTIC regression analysis ,DATA analysis ,SECONDARY analysis ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,OLD age ,PREVENTION - Abstract
Background: Although free eye testing is available in the UK from a nation-wide network of optometrists, there is evidence of unrecognised, tractable vision loss amongst older people. A recent review identified this unmet need as a priority for further investigation, highlighting the need to understand public perceptions of eye services and barriers to service access and utilisation. This paper aims to identify risk factors for (1) having poor vision and (2) not having had an eyesight check among community-dwelling older people without an established ophthalmological diagnosis. Methods: Secondary analysis of self-reported data from the ProAge trial. 1792 people without a known ophthalmological diagnosis were recruited from three group practices in London. Results: Almost two in ten people in this population of older individuals without known ophthalmological diagnoses had self-reported vision loss, and more than a third of them had not had an eye test in the previous twelve months. In this sample, those with limited education, depressed mood, need for help with instrumental and basic activities of daily living (IADLs and BADLs), and subjective memory complaints were at increased risk of fair or poor self-reported vision. Individuals with basic education only were at increased risk for not having had an eye test in the previous 12 months (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.17-1.98 p=0.002), as were those with no, or only one chronic condition (OR 1.850, 95% CI 1.382-2.477, p<0.001). Conclusions: Self-reported poor vision in older people without ophthalmological diagnoses is associated with other functional losses, with no or only one chronic condition, and with depression. This pattern of disorders may be the basis for case finding in general practice. Low educational attainment is an independent determinant of not having had eye tests, as well as a factor associated with undiagnosed vision loss. There are other factors, not identified in this study, which determine uptake of eye testing in those with self-reported vision loss. Further exploration is needed to identify these factors and lead towards effective case finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
44. Does patient self-management education of primary care professionals improve patient outcomes: a systematic review
- Author
-
Rochfort, Andree, Beirne, Sinead, Doran, Gillian, Patton, Patricia, Gensichen, Jochen, Kunnamo, Ilkka, Smith, Susan, Eriksson, Tina, and Collins, Claire
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
45. Job satisfaction and career intentions of registered nurses in primary health care: an integrative review
- Author
-
Halcomb, Elizabeth, Smyth, Elizabeth, and McInnes, Susan
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
46. Targeted prevention in primary care aimed at lifestyle-related diseases: a study protocol for a non-randomised pilot study
- Author
-
Larsen, Lars Bruun, Sonderlund, Anders Larrabee, Sondergaard, Jens, Thomsen, Janus Laust, Halling, Anders, Hvidt, Niels Christian, Hvidt, Elisabeth Assing, Mønsted, Troels, Pedersen, Line Bjornskov, Roos, Ewa M., Pedersen, Pia Vivian, and Thilsing, Trine
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
47. Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: a systematic review
- Author
-
Lawati, Muna Habib AL., Dennis, Sarah, Short, Stephanie D., and Abdulhadi, Nadia Noor
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
48. Implementing new care models: learning from the Greater Manchester demonstrator pilot experience
- Author
-
Elvey, Rebecca, Bailey, Simon, Checkland, Kath, McBride, Anne, Parkin, Stephen, Rothwell, Katy, and Hodgson, Damian
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
49. A qualitative study on the implementation of family health team: the perspectives of providers and patients.
- Author
-
Mohd Hanafiah, Ainul Nadziha, Johari, Mohammad Zabri, and Azam, Syafinas
- Subjects
ALLIED health personnel ,FAMILY health ,FOCUS groups ,INTEGRATED health care delivery ,INTERVIEWING ,RESEARCH methodology ,NURSES ,PATIENTS ,PHYSICIANS ,PRIMARY health care ,RESEARCH funding ,QUALITATIVE research ,JUDGMENT sampling ,THEMATIC analysis - Abstract
Background: Malaysia has committed to the global call to achieve universal health coverage, and with the adoption of Sustainable Development Goals, is further strengthening the health system through the primary health care services, particularly the family doctor concept. The Enhanced Primary Health Care (EnPHC) initiative was implemented to address the worrying upward trend of non-communicable disease prevalence, and incorporates the Family Health Team (FHT) concept. The aim of this paper is to describe the implementation of the FHT as part of the EnPHC intervention. Methods: In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with the intervention design team, healthcare providers and patients in two rounds during the implementation period. A total of 121 individuals in the two rounds, split into different groups, where some of the participants of the FGD were also interviewed individually. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis, with codes being organised into larger themes. Results: Themes that emerged from the data were around the process of FHT implementation and the advantages of the FHT, which included continuity of health care and improved quality of care. Patients and health care providers were receptive to the FHT concept, and took the effort to adapt the concept in the local settings. Conclusions: The FHT concept implemented at 20 public primary health clinics has benefits appreciated by health care providers and patients. Addressing the viable shortcomings would better prepare the current primary healthcare system to scale up the FHT concept nationwide and enhance its feasibility and sustainability. Trial registration: The study is registered with the National Medical Research Register, Ministry of Health Malaysia (NMRR-17-295-34711). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
50. Factors that facilitate recognition and management of domestic violence by primary care physicians in a Chinese context - a mixed methods study in Hong Kong.
- Author
-
Lam, Tai Pong, Chan, Hoi Yan, Piterman, Leon, Wong, Mei Wa, Sun, Kai Sing, Lam, Kwok Fai, Chan, Tak Hon, Dan, Wu, and Tiwari, Agnes
- Subjects
ALEXITHYMIA ,CLINICAL competence ,COMMUNICATIVE competence ,CONTINUUM of care ,FAMILY psychotherapy ,DOMESTIC violence ,FOCUS groups ,INTERPROFESSIONAL relations ,INTERVIEWING ,MEDICAL protocols ,MEDICAL referrals ,MENTAL health services ,PHYSICIAN-patient relations ,GENERAL practitioners ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,SURVEYS ,TRUST ,BRUISES ,PRIVATE sector ,PUBLIC sector ,PSYCHOSOCIAL factors - Abstract
Background: Domestic violence is common in the community. Many of its victims present to primary care physicians (PCPs) but are not being recognized and managed. The barriers, with specific reference to a Chinese cultural context, were investigated earlier. This paper explored the factors which facilitated the process of recognizing and managing suspected cases of domestic violence by PCPs in Hong Kong. Methods: Four focus group interviews were conducted to explore in-depth the experiences of PCPs in recognition, management and referral of domestic violence cases from which facilitators were identified. The relevant themes were then investigated in a questionnaire survey with 504 PCPs working in public and private sectors. Results: The focus group participants emphasized mood symptoms as useful indicators for probable abuse and continuity of care was important to unmask issues of domestic violence. The top facilitators perceived by the respondents of the survey included: a trusting doctor-patient relationship (99.8%), good communication skills (99.0%), patients' unexplained bruises (96.3%), medical history (94.6%), and mood symptoms (94.4%). Further, the survey found that PCPs with longer years of practice, a medical degree obtained from Western countries, and postgraduate training in family counselling or psychological medicine perceived more facilitators in managing domestic violence. Conclusions: Without a local screening policy and training protocol to manage domestic violence, PCPs regarded their skills in mental healthcare and good relationships with patients as the key facilitators. While training in mental health care helps PCPs manage domestic violence, a specific protocol emphasizing medical-social collaboration is anticipated to facilitate them to take a more proactive and effective stance from screening to management. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.