Search

Objective This study aims to ascertain if differences exist in the perception of the professional practice environment and personal well-being of nurses across different geographical areas in Queensland. Design This paper was performed on a prospective, self-report cross-sectional on-line survey. Setting The study was conducted among the nurses employed in public and private health care settings: acute hospitals, community health and aged care in Queensland, Australia. Participants Participants of this study were 1608 registered and enrolled nurses and assistants in nursing, current members of the Queensland Nurses Union in 2013 and who provided a workplace postcode. One thousand eight of these participants worked in major cities, while 382 in rural locations and 238 in remote areas. Interventions None. Main outcome measures Scores of well-being as determined by the following scales: the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale, the Professional Quality of Life Scale version 5, the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale and of the Professional Practice Environment using the Practice Environment Scale - Nursing Work Index Revised. Results Nurses employed in major cities perceived 'nursing foundations for quality care' more favourably than those from other settings. Remote area nurses had lower levels of secondary traumatic stress than nurses in major cities and rural areas. There was no difference between nurses across their geographical locations for stress, anxiety, depression, compassion satisfaction, burnout, resilience and the four other measures of the Practice Environment Scale. Conclusions The study findings provide new data suggesting that, with the exception of secondary traumatic stress, the personal well-being of nurses does not differ across geographical settings. Similarly, with the exception of the subscale of 'nursing foundations for quality care' there was no difference in perceptions of the professional practice environment. As secondary traumatic stress is associated with burnout, this finding needs to be investigated further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Little is known about whether rural-urban differences exist in patients after hip and knee joint replacement surgery. We compared patient characteristics, pain and functional outcomes of rural and urban patients undergoing joint replacement surgery in a single high-volume metropolitan centre. Design Prospective cohort study conducted in patients who underwent primary elective hip ( THJR) or knee replacement ( TKJR) between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2009. Setting A university-affiliated tertiary referral centre situated in the central metropolitan region of Melbourne, Australia. Participants One thousand nine hundred fifty-five consecutive patients undergoing primary total joint replacement. Main outcome measure Pain and function were assessed preoperatively and 12 and 24 months postoperatively. The main independent variable was geographic location specifically comparing patients residing in rural/regional compared with urban communities. Results A total of 2193 primary joint replacements were performed (981 THJR and 1212 TKJR) in 1955 patients. Rural patients presented at a younger age and with earlier radiographic disease than their urban counterparts. There was a higher rate of rheumatoid arthritis among rural patients presenting for TKJR. There was no difference in pain and function scores between groups at 12 and 24 months post-surgery. Conclusion In our series of 1955 patients undergoing total hip and knee joint replacement surgery, rural patients presented at a younger age and an earlier stage of disease progression. At 24 months, rural patients had pain and functional outcomes as good as their urban counterparts. More research is required to determine which factors lead to the early presentation of rural patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective To elucidate the differences in job stress and burnout status of Japanese hospital physicians between large cities, small cities, and towns and villages. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Postal self-administered questionnaires were distributed to 2937 alumni of Asahikawa Medical University. Participants Four hundred and twenty-two hospital physicians. Main outcome measures The Brief Job Stress Questionnaire was used to evaluate job demand, job control and social support. The Japanese version of the Maslach Burnout Inventory- General Survey ( MBI-GS) was used to evaluate burnout. An analysis of covariance was conducted on the mean scores on the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire and the MBI-GS scales after adjusting for sex, age and specialties. Results In adjusted analyses, the job demand score was significantly different among physicians in the three areas. In Bonferroni post-hoc tests, scores in large cities was significantly higher than those in small cities and towns and villages. The job control score showed a significant difference and a marginally significant trend, with large cities associated with lower job control. There were significant differences in support from supervisors and that from family/friends, and scores in large cities was significantly higher than those in small cities in the post-hoc test. There was a significant effect on the exhaustion scale of the MBI-GS, with large cities associated with higher exhaustion, and scores in large cities was significantly higher than those in small cities. Conclusions Urban hospital physicians had more job demand, less job control and exhaustion caused by burnout, and rural hospital physicians had less social support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]