Search

This paper presents a comprehensive substance flow analysis (SFA) of phosphorus (P) for a six-year period (2008–13) in Gippsland, a key agricultural region of Australia with high economic and environmental significance. The analysis has revealed that around 71% (10,904 t) of the mean annual total inflow of P was stored in this region. This finding is different from other published regional scale SFAs, where more than 50% of the P in annual total inflow eventually left the region. Per capita P inflow in Gippsland is also found substantially higher compared to available SFAs. In Gippsland, the annual inflow of P primarily occurred as commercial fertilizer (66% or 10,263 t) and livestock feed (29% or 4443 t), and the outflow mainly occurred as livestock products (94% or 4181 t); while the majority (66% or 7218 t) of the P storage occurred in soils of the livestock farming area. A comparative analysis of the magnitude of P flow in different subsystems indicates that more than 80% of the annual total inflow, outflow, and storage of P in this region is associated with the livestock (mainly dairy and meat cattle) farming subsystem. For the Gippsland region as a whole and almost all subsystems, significant annual variations in the magnitudes of P inflow, outflow, storage and internal flow have been observed. Between 2008 and 2013, both the annual total inflow (mainly as commercial fertilizer) and the annual total storage (mainly in soils) of P in this region showed a substantial decrease (41% and 54% of the 2008 level, respectively), while the annual total outflow (mainly as livestock and crop products) remained nearly the same, indicating an improvement towards sustainable P management. Despite such a positive sign, there is still adequate room for improvement. This analysis indicates that over the study period, about 65,424 t P were accumulated (mainly as soil storage) that is approximately six times the mean annual P inflow as commercial fertilizer in this region; while approximately 3241 t P lost as soil erosion and runoff, indicating substantial adverse economic and environmental implications. Based on the findings of the current analysis, this paper outlines a wide range of policy and management interventions to reduce the downstream loss of P and other nutrients as well as the region's dependency on imported commercial fertilizers and grain based feed. This paper also presents new criteria for data quality analysis and a set of P concentration data of various materials that could be readily utilized in future SFAs of P at any geographical scale. This paper suggests that considering the inter-annual variations in P flow as assessed in this SFA, future research should focus on identifying the influence of socio-environmental, technological and political factors on the magnitude P flow in Gippsland. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Policy makers in the agricultural sector are confronted with challenges which might drive land use change and ultimately agricultural profitability to a substantial degree. The challenges include questions around climate variability, demographic changes, use of land for bio-fuel production and ensuring an increase in food production. As profitability triggers many agri-business decisions, knowledge about the existing socio-economic landscape and the economic profile of a region as well as potential impacts on profits provides useful contextual information when agricultural policies are designed. Given the upcoming challenges and their associated uncertainties, it is important to ensure that a map of agricultural profit can be reproduced in a scenario and simulation setting which will allow exploring uncertainties around the impacts on agricultural profits as well. There is however currently no flexible system in operation which allows for a consistent update of a map of agricultural profits in Australia or elsewhere. This paper describes a process that has been developed to produce a map of agricultural profit for Australia for the year 2005/2006. The process involves a complex data architecture that accounts for heterogeneous information that is collected by a variety of institutions across different scales. All information can be comfortably queried and query results can be forwarded for immediate processing and subsequent visualisation in a geographic information system (GIS). To facilitate the production of profit maps in the future, the system provides flexibility regarding an update of new economic information but it can also be linked to maps that show an updated distribution of land use. A map of agricultural profit on a large scale and regular updates thereof will help understand profit trends in time and across space. It will help identifying regions that have a lower economic profile and will inform decisions regarding the design of regulatory policies. As these maps are developed using national scale data, we do not recommend using the results at the farm level but we suggest using separate catchment scale profit assessments to calibrate the national scale profit map. The proposed system is well suited to be used in various land use management and economic scenarios and will represent a step forward regarding a scenario impact assessment on agricultural profits. It will also help understand the economic benefit of land use on a large scale. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: The Moore Catchment, which lies to the north of Perth in Western Australia, suffers from a number of problems related to water management. Farmers want to manage salinity and waterlogging problems through the use of drains, but this has possible negative off-farm impacts on both the environment and flood risk. Views on responsibilities for managing water within the catchment differ between farmers, local communities and government agencies. This paper reports the results from surveys of attitudes towards catchment management, for two community groups: residents of Perth and residents of rural towns in the catchment. These surveys elicited general attitudes towards the environment and agriculture, and views on responsibilities for managing the catchment. It also included a choice modelling section, where the attributes under consideration included the area of land under salt and trees, ecological risks to off-farm wetlands and risk of flooding, farm incomes and personal financial contributions to a management fund. Preliminary results indicate that residents of both rural towns and Perth are willing to pay to avoid damage to the natural environment, both on and off-farm, as well as the risk of flooding. Perhaps more surprisingly, whether farmers’ incomes were being negatively affected in a choice set has a very strong impact on the choice made. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

FARMSCAPE (Farmers'', Advisers'', Researchers'', Monitoring, Simulation, Communication And Performance Evaluation) is a program of participatory research with the farming community of northeast Australia. It initially involved research to explore whether farmers and their advisers could gain benefit from tools such as soil characterisation and sampling, climate forecasts and, in particular, simulation modelling. Its current focus is facilitating the implementation of commercial delivery systems for these same tools in order to meet industry demand for their access. This paper presents the story of what was done over the past decade, it provides performance indicators of impact, it reflects on what was learnt over this period and it outlines where this research is likely to head in the future.Over the past 10 years, the FARMSCAPE team employed a Participatory Action Research approach to explore whether farmers could value simulation as a decision support tool for managing their farming system and if so, could it be delivered cost-effectively. Through farmer group engagement, on-farm trials, soil characterisation, monitoring of crops, soils and climate, and sessions to apply the APSIM systems simulator, FARMSCAPE represented a research program on decision support intervention. Initial scepticism by farmers and commercial consultants about the value of APSIM was addressed by testing its performance both against measured data from on-farm trials and against farmers'' experiences with past commercial crops. Once this credibility check was passed, simulation sessions usually evolved into participants interactively inquiring of the model the consequence of alternative management options. These ‘What if’ questions using APSIM were contextualised using local climate and soil data and the farmer''s actual or proposed management rules.The active participation of farmers and their advisers, and working in the context of their own farming operations, were the key ingredients in the design, implementation and interpretation of the FARMSCAPE approach to decision support. The attraction of the APSIM systems simulator to farmers contemplating change was that it allowed them to explore their own system in a manner equivalent to learning from experience. To achieve this, APSIM had to be credible and flexible. While direct engagement of farmers initially enabled only a limited number of beneficiaries, this approach generated a commercial market for timely and high quality interactions based on soil monitoring and simulation amongst a significant sector of the farming community. Current efforts are therefore focused on the training, support and accreditation of commercial agronomists in the application of the FARMSCAPE approach and tools.The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support has come to represent an approach to guiding science-based engagement with farm decision making which is being tested nationally and internationally. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]