Search

The rapid acquisition of soil water content (SWC) in field crop root zone is significant for drought supervision and precision irrigation. The UAV multispectral remote sensing system has the advantages of obtaining high spatial-temporal resolution of crop phenotype data, and has a wide application prospect in soil moisture monitoring. In order to obtain SWC accurately and timely at a farm scale, in this paper, the field maize with different water treatments is taken as the research object, and the multispectral remote sensing monitoring of summer maize is carried out by using the UAV remote sensing platform, and the soil water content of different soil depth in maize root zone is collected synchronously. Based on the UAV multispectral remote sensing image data sets of jointing stage, tasseling-silking stage and milky-maturity stage of summer maize in 2018, the soil background is removed by support vector machine classification, the spectral reflection of maize canopy is extracted, and the 10 vegetation indices are calculated, then the sensitivity analysis of soil water content in different depth is carried out by using full subset screening method for different wave bands and vegetation indices, and the soil water content in different depth is analyzed respectively, ridge regression and extreme learning machine are used to construct quantitative estimation models of soil water content at 0-20, 20-45 and 45-60 cm soil depth after full subset selection. The test area is located in Zhaojun Town, Dalate Banner, Ordos, Inner Mongolia, China(40°26'0.29" N, 109°36'25.99" E, elevation 1 010 m). The sowing time of maize is on May 11, 2018, the emergence time is on May 18, and the harvest time is on September 8, 2018. The total growth period is 114 days. The UAV multispectral remote sensing images and ground data collection dates are July 8, July 12, July 17, July 21, July 26, August 2, August 28 and September 7, 2018. It is collected once a day and tested 8 times in the whole growth period. July 8-21 is the jointing stage, July 26-August 2 is the tasseling-silking stage, August 28-september 7 is the milk-maturity stage. The flight altitude of the UAV is 70 m, and the flight time is 11:00-13:00 local time (11:44-13:44 Beijing time). Firstly, the UAV multispectral canopy images of field maize with 5 different irrigation treatments (TRTs) are acquired through the six-rotor UAV equipped with a RedEdge multispectral camera ( MicaSense, USA), and the multispectral images of diffuse reflector (reflectivity 58%, size 3×3 m) are collected at the same height to perform radiometric correction in the meantime, and then the spectral reflectances of the field maize are acquired. Secondly, the support vector machine (SVM) is used to eliminate the multispectral image of soil background in ENVI and ArcGIS software, then the maize canopy spectral reflectance is extracted and 10 vegetation indices (VIs), such as Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Normalized Green Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI) and Transformed Chlorophyll Absorption In Reflectance Index(TCARI), etc, are calculated. Finally, the full subset selection method based on Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) is used to analyze the sensitivity of SWC at different depths for different spectra bands and vegetation indices in R3.5.1 software, and then Ridge Regression (RR) as well as Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) are used to construct a quantitative estimation model of SWC at soil depths of 0-20, 20-45 and 45-60 cm at different growth stages, respectively. The results show that the full subset selection method based on BIC can effectively select the optimal spectral subset, and the selected variables generally pass the significance test and the independent variables number is small; the effects of the ELM model outperformed the RR model almost under all the same conditions; the optimal monitoring soil depth of maize at jointing stage, tasseling-silking stage is 0-20 cm, and the optimal monitoring soil depth of milk-maturity stage is 20-45 cm; the ELM inversion model at 20-45 cm soil depth at milk-maturity stage has the best effect, the decision coefficients of modeling set and verification set are 0.825 and 0.750, respectively, the root mean square error are 1.00% and 1.32%, respectively, and the normalized root mean square error are 10.85% and 13.55%, respectively. The combination of full subset selection method and machine learning can improve the inversion accuracy and robustness of SWC. This study provides a new way for rapid and accurate monitoring of SWC in farmland and precise irrigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mountain vegetation information plays an important role in climate change research and ecological environment protection. Remote sensing technology can quickly acquire mountain vegetation information, but there are the influence of mountain terrain shadows and mountain vegetation information confusion. This paper took mountain vegetation as the research object and analyzed the main characteristics of mountain vegetation based on the multi-spectral data of Landsat satellite remote sensing image. Learn from the structural principle and form of the shadow elimination vegetation index (SEVI), a vegetation index algorithm - Vegetation distinguished and shadow eliminated vegetation index (VDSEVI) for mountain vegetation cover remote sensing monitoring was proposed. Samples for comparison and analysis were selected according to the main land cover types in the study area. The accuracy, validity and practicability of mountain vegetation information extraction with different vegetation indices were compared and analyzed. There are certain criteria which vegetation index of the same vegetation cover in shady and sunny should be equivalent, and the vegetation index values of different vegetation cover should be differentiated and compliance with actual vegetation coverage. Comparative analysis methods for different vegetation indices include: the images of different vegetation indices were directly compared; the vegetation index values of the same vegetation in shady and sunny cover were compared; the vegetation index values of the different land cover types were compared; the correlation between vegetation index and cosi was analyzed. The VDSEVI was compared with the ratio vegetation index(RVI), the normalized vegetation index(NDVI), the enhanced vegetation index(EVI2) and SEVI. There was a significant difference in the mean value of VDSEVI among different land cover types. The relative error of the sparse woodland in shady and sunny was small, which was 3.428%. The standard deviation of each land cover type sample was less than 0.060.The shady area of the Nalati in Xinjiang was dominated by woodland, and the sunny area was dominated by grassland. Therefore, the vegetation index and cosi should be negatively correlated. The correlation coefficient between VDSEVI and cosi is -0.800.The data results showed that compared with RVI, NDVI, EVI2 and SEVI, VDSEVI eliminated the influence of terrain shadows, and had a large amount of information and strong recognition of vegetation coverage. The problem of vegetation information confusion was solved, and the actual situation of mountain vegetation cover was reflected. To verify the suitability of VDSEVI in other regions, VDSEVI was applied to the area of Arxan in Inner Mongolia and Minhou County in Fuzhou City. The results showed that VDSEVI was equally effective. Vegetation information was extracted based on VDSEVI threshold method in Nalati in Xinjiang, Arxan in Inner Mongolia and Minhou County in Fuzhou City. The threshold was calculated by the VDSEVI value of samples from comparative analysis of various land cover types. Finally, the results of vegetation information extraction were evaluated by validating samples. The overall accuracy of vegetation information extraction in the three regions was 84.136%, 87.339%, 86.709% respectively, and the Kappa coefficients were 0.799, 0.788 and 0.791 respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Estimating soil salinity is imperative for scheduling irrigation and remediating saline soil but difficult at large scales. Remote sensing can bridge this gap because of its advantages in low cost and large-area coverage; it has become an efficient method for assessing soil salinization in field. One issue in use of remote sensing to assess saline soil is the presence of plastic film mulch and bare soil because of their difference in reflecting waves in the spectral bands. In order to investigate the effect of plastic film mulch on soil salinity inversion using UAV multispectral remote sensing, we studied four plots with plastic film mulch at the Shahaoqu Irrigation area in the Hetao Irrigation District, Inner Mongolia of China. From each plot, we took soil samples and measured their salt contents from May to July. We also flew a drone to simultaneously take multispectral images of the sampling sites and extracted the spectral reflectance to calculate the spectral indices. Correlation analysis found that the S4, S6, SI1, SI2, SI3 and BI indices can be used to calculate soil salinity. Six-band spectral reflectances and six spectral indices obtained from different datasets were used as independent variables to calculate the salt content with the support vector machine (SVM), the back propagation neural network (BPNN) and the extreme learning machine (ELM), respectively, before and after the mulch film was removed. We compared the three models based on their determination coefficient (R²), root mean squared error (RMSE) and relative error (RE). The results showed that plastic film mulch did impact on soil salinity inversion. Although all three models could adequately estimate the soil salt contents before and after the film removal, they worked better after the film removal than before the film removal. Models based on the spectral indices were more accurate than those based on the spectral reflectances, and the accuracy of the inversely calculated salt content varied with sampling time and treatment. The inversion results based on monthly data differed from those based on by pooling all data. After the film was removed in June, the salt content estimated using the model was most accurate, with its associated R² and RMSE being 0.695 and 0.182 respectively for the spectral reflectance-based method, and 0.663 and 0.191respectively for the spectral indices-based method. The salt content estimated by BPNN was least accurate in May, with its associated R² and RMSE being 0.766 and 0.161 respectively for the spectral reflectance-based method, and 0.769, 0.162 respectively for the spectral indices-based method. Comparison of the three models revealed that ELM was most accurate, followed by SVM and BPNN, although their errors were within the tolerable range. In summary, this paper provides an effective method to inversely calculate soil salinization at large mulched farmland using UAV multispectral remote sensing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]