Search

Aims: To explore Australian healthcare providers' perspectives on factors that influence disclosure and domestic violence screening through the lens of Heise's (1998) integrated ecological framework. Design: This paper reports the findings that were part of a sequential mixed methods study with survey data informing interview questions. Participants for interviews were recruited after expressing an interest after completing surveys, as well as via snowball sampling. Methods: Semi‐structured interviews were undertaken in 2017 with 12 practicing healthcare providers delivering care to women in the perinatal period in Greater Western Sydney, NSW, Australia. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's (2006) six‐step thematic approach. Findings The findings were framed within Heise's integrated ecological framework under four main themes. The main themes were 'Ontogenic: Factors preventing women from disclosing'; 'Microsystem: Factors preventing healthcare providers from asking'; 'Exosystem: Organizational structures not conducive to screening'; and 'Macrosystem: Cultural attitudes and socioeconomic influences affecting screening'. Conclusion: Organizational policies are needed for better systems of reminding healthcare providers to enquire for domestic and family violence and mandating this within their practices. Mandatory domestic and family violence education and training that is suitable for the time constraints and learning needs of the healthcare provider is recommended for all healthcare providers caring for perinatal women. Further research is needed in addressing culturally specific barriers for healthcare providers to enquire about domestic and family violence in a culturally appropriate way. Public and Patient Engagement and Involvement in Research (PPEI): No Patient or Public Contribution was embedded into the research reported in this paper as this research was specifically exploring healthcare providers' perspectives on domestic violence screening within their own practice experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To explore the experiences of refugees who became registered nurses after arriving to Australia. Design: Qualitative description using a naturalistic inquiry framework. Methods: Between February 2018 and September 2019, the lead author conducted semi‐structured interviews with employed registered nurses (RNs) that are former refugees and English‐speaking. Interviews were 45–90 min' duration and digitally recorded. Participants provided voluntary informed consent and were sent questions beforehand. Data were collected and coded into themes. Rigor was achieved with multiple transcript readings by the research team to confirm common themes. Results: Twelve participants discussed their story. Three major themes were identified: (1) Milestone of being a refugee; (2) Milestone of resettling in Australia; (3) Milestone of becoming a RN. Conclusion: Each participant's story started at a place of disadvantage. They progressed successfully through the three milestones; despite living with traumatic experiences, they learned new skills, developed English literacy, became a RN and juggled the demands of life. This paper highlights the poorly understood pockets of the current Australian RN workforce. Impact statement: The nuanced stories of RNs with refugee backgrounds in this study move beyond trauma and struggle and demonstrate the important journey this particular group of health professionals undertake. Increasing the contextual knowledge of the complex lives of former refugees turned nursing professionals will raise public awareness of the diversity of life experiences of RNs working in Australia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and objectives: To explore the structures, processes and outcomes involved in an Automated Medication Dispensing system implementation and its impact on patient safety. Background: Increasing digitalisation of medication prescribing, dispensing, administration and stock management has occurred over the past two decades. While automated medication dispensing units aim to provide safe, high‐quality, patient‐centred care, the implementation may result in unintended consequences leading to suboptimal outcomes. Design: This study uses a qualitative approach guided by Donabedian's structure, process and outcome framework. Methods: Twenty‐six registered nurses and pharmacy assistant staff, from clinical areas equipped with automated medication dispensing cabinets, participated in semi‐structured interviews. In‐depth, thematic analysis explored the structures and processes. Together with interview data, content analysis of text data generated by internal risk management and critical incident reporting systems was undertaken to evaluate outcomes. Findings were considered in light of the Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis approach to health information technology. The COREQ checklist was used in preparation of this article. Results: Pharmacy assistants reported better satisfaction with the system at implementation than nurses. Training provided for nurses and their involvement in system implementation was reported as insufficient; however, nurses' use of and satisfaction with the system improved over time. A recursive relationship between the changes imposed by the system and nurses' creative problem solving (workarounds) used to manage these changes, impacted work productivity for nurses and safety for patients. Conclusions: The individualised nature of "workarounds" employed offered both risks and opportunities which require further identification, investigation and management. Relevance to clinical practice: Nurses are the majority of the health workforce. Digitalisation of traditionally paper‐based activities in health care, impacting nursing work, requires similar strategies to any practice change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]